Editor
 
www.terrierworld.co.uk

 Confidentiality Guaranteed

 

 

 

Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Bichon Frise (email:) on Tuesday, April 03, 2012 at 17:15:58
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Sir, you have pointed out a scandelous happening that occurred at Crufts.

The Kennel Club allow two professional handlers to bend the rules. One handler was judging the Utility Group whilst the other handler exhibited their dog in the Toy Group.

What a nonesense to say that the dog is only registered to one of them. They live together and it's their dog. These two handlers think that they're untouchable.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
nil (nil) on Saturday, March 31, 2012 at 19:25:39
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Hello Terrier World letters,

well done for having the courage to highlight what is going on with certain handlers. The recognised press go along with it in my view, because they're all peeing in the same pot.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
none (email:no) on Sunday, March 25, 2012 at 21:22:47
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: West Highland White
comments: Dear Editor,
it is about time that the kennel club put its own house in order instead of attacking breeders to appease Jemima Harrison.

The absurd policy of allowing pro handlers to judge is totally out of order.

What hotel were the judges staying at on the NEC complex and did their partners share their rooms?
The mere fact that a professional handler is judging a group and his partner is exhibiting their dog on the same day is out of order and it would be fair to assume that they both were mingling with all of the judges in the hotel the night before judging.

They say that fish rot from the head down. You have inherited the odor from the previous chairman Mr Dean and it stinks. Sort it out professor Dean, chairman of the kennel club.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
To Letters (email:) on Sunday, March 25, 2012 at 18:47:46
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Dandie Dinmont
comments: Dear Terrier World, after reading your open letter to Steve Dean KC chairman I must say I am surprised. Surprised because the American KC are far better set up in dealing with professional handlers judging. It doesn't happen.

Watching the judging of the groups on TV I heard presenter Claire Balding say as the Utility Group Judge was being accompanied into the ring; Utility Group Judge Geoff Corish Together with Michael Coad have owned many Top Winning Bichon Frises.

The Toy Group was the second to be judged and Mr Corish's Partner Michael Coad was in this group with their Bichon Frise. Surely this cannot be right. These two Handlers are being allowed by the Kennel Club to do as they please.

Well done Terrier World for highlighting a very serious problem that is growing. The Kennel Club should address this most serious conflict of interests immediately and take a leaf from the American KC.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Stuart Yearley (email: stuartyearley@yahoo.co.uk) on Friday, March 16, 2012 at 08:03:46
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Bedlington
comments: Unfortunately judges are over a barrel on this one. I stand to be corrected but I believe a judge can withhold C.C's and class placings but must declare a Best of Breed regardless of the quality or apparent health of the exhibits before him/her.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
anonymous (none) on Thursday, March 15, 2012 at 15:48:33
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Scottish
comments: Dear Editor,

On the coverage of Crufts it was mentioned (not sure who by) that the KC will be asking the Judges who put up these dogs that were not passed by the Vet to explain their decision to award BOB to that particular dog.

This is dangerous ground for us as Judges I feel, I am not trained as a Vet and I dont think any KC should be asking us to downgrade dogs based on health issues like that.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Stuart Yearley (email:stuartyearley@yahoo.co.uk) on Monday, March 12, 2012 at 22:51:14
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Bedlington
comments: Where the K.C. got their veterinary checks wrong was in their selection of "high profile" dogs only for health testing.

There are many dogs around with far more serious genetic defects than droopy eyelids or wrinkles.

After working for thirty years trying to eradicate an invisible, but often lethal defect in my own breed, I feel that all B.O.B. owners should be required to show test results for any recognised inherited defects in their breed.

In the case of small breed gene pools, affected and carrier dogs should not be excluded or disqualified as this could eliminate many quality dogs from an already limited gene pool. Once a visible or DNA test is available it is perfectly legitimate to use affected and carriers of a defect to be used in a sensible controlled breeding programme. Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Our own foundation bitch was affected with a semi-lethal gene which was invisible, but by careful testing and selection five generations of healthy offspring have been bred, culminating in a dog clear of the defect and of sufficient quality to be B.O.B. at Crufts and Top Dog two years running.

Most of the high profile breeds have limited genepools and it is going to take more than a couple of years to eliminate problems so come on Kennel Club give the breeders a little more time to make improvements. I appreciate that the K.C. is under pressure to "do something" but with the best will in the world you cannot undo a hundred years of breeding in a couple of generations.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
none (none) on Monday, March 05, 2012 at 14:39:31
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: To Terrier World.

Sir, I think that is is disgusting that the Editor of your paper says that he/she will name names of those who attended the seminar that Dog world held. It is up to the individual if they want to learn how to write a critique. Shame on you.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Ch Show Entry Fees average £25 nowadays. Then you have your traveling expenses on top of this and all of the rest that goes with it. If I am paying out these costs, then I would be none to pleased if the Judge that I had entered under needed to attend a Seminar on 'How To Write A Critique.' Ed.]

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
will TW publish/ (email:) on Sunday, March 04, 2012 at 18:15:54
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Border
comments: Dear Editor,

will you have the guts to publish the names of the planks who attended the critiques seminar?

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[If I am sent the names of those who attended the Critiques Seminar that Dog World held, then yes I will publish them. Ed.]

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Seminar (email:anonymous) on Saturday, March 03, 2012 at 19:14:47
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: I am writing to say that the comments regarding the judging critiques seminar are absolutely right.

Dog World are up to every conceivable racket to generate money. Could they be in trouble financially?

If they continue with this ridiculous judges critique seminar could terrier world publish the names of those who attend, those who haven't got the intelligence how to write about the virtues and the faults of a dog?

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Poor Ring Manner (email:) on Friday, March 02, 2012 at 20:12:04
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Cairn
comments: What a laugh Andrew Brace giving a talk on Judges writing up critiques. Is this the same Andrew Brace who was fined by the Kennel Club for poor ring manner?

"ANDREW BRACE, one of the UK’s top all-round judges, has been warned and fined £300 over the nature of his judging of Border collies at Blackpool last year.

Following the judging, many people watched the video of Mr Brace on YouTube, and many more commented on an apparent lack of interest in the exhibits. Several complaints were lodged with the Kennel Club.

At its meeting in February, the General Committee considered these objections and subsequently upheld them. The Committee said it ‘was particularly disturbed by Mr brace’s cursory nature of examination of exhibits and his disinterested, detached and offhand manner towards exhibitors.’

He was found to be in breach of Regulation F9 - failing to maintain and abide by the highest standards in accordance with KC Rules and regulations and the Code of Best Practice for Judges." (Our Dogs)

Pompous as a description is an understatement. He can be seen at most shows swanning around with his little entourage of brown nosers, all full of his importance. he lists his University as;
"Birmingham College Of Food And Domestic Art"
His Philosophy is an Oscar Wilde Quote: "Always Forgive Your Enemies; Nothing Annoys Them So Much"

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Pompous Andrew H Brace (He's A Spoofer) on Friday, March 02, 2012 atn19:41:03
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Manchester
comments: After reading the letter about the critiques seminar I went onto the DW site to see the article for myself. After waiting for pages to load timing out etc, I finally found it on news page 8.

This is just a money spinner for DW with the Pompous Andrew Brace fronting it along with a DW underling.

If we really need seminars to instruct judges on how to write a critique, God help us!

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Critique Seminar? (Pull The Other One!) on Friday, March 02, 2012 at 14:24:00
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Border
comments: Dear Letters,

I have just come across an article in Dog World about their recent "Critiques Seminar".
I am absolutely amazed that dog World are so condescending to think that people are so inadequate that they cannot write a critique, it's not rocket science!

They claim that there was 60 people in attendance to hear Andrew Brace and Adrian Marett give their lectures. I would say that anyone who attended this so called "Critique Seminar" should never accept a judging appointment, they must be as thick as short planks.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
DOG WORLD RIP OFF (DON'T BUY IT DOESN'T WORK) on Tuesday, February 14, 2012 at 18:40:46
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Border
comments: Dog World have launched a new App for their web site. What a joke!

Their web site doesn't work nor does the App. The app costs £2.99 from itunes and with it you get a 30 day free trial and then it's a £50 subscription for the year. DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY.

Just look at the front page of Dog World's web site, it has a message on Dog World Updates which reads, "You may experience difficulties accessing the breed notes and show reports. We are working to resolve this problem as quickly as possible."
DIFFICULTIES? IT COSTS £60 FOR A CODE TO ACCESS IT!

This message has been there for months and they still haven't fixed the problem. The bottom line is they are charging you for content that you can't access.

IT'S A RIP OFF DON'T SUBSCRIBE OR YOU WILL BE DISSAPOINTED!

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Anon (Pony Express) on Monday, February 13, 2012 at 19:13:11
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Hello Editor,

I find your website very informative. I don't think that there is anything that you haven't covered.
Dog World website is a waste of time, they should seriously look at what they are putting out, most of it doesn't work.

The reason for my message is I was reading the Kerry breed notes and I clicked on the link to the Arkama website. I then had a look at the pedigrees. At least two of them are wrong. anyone researching breeding should beware of this site and its pedigrees.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Christine Churchill (pagan@acenet.net.au) on Saturday, February 11, 2012 at 09:16:34
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Manchester
comments: Hi

I have just attempted to read the description of the above breed on your site.
It needs a bit of work for it to make sense and suggest that it is proof read before being released to the public arena

I also understand that the Whippet was developed after the Manchester Terrier and that the Greyhound was used in the development of both the Manchester Terrier and the Whippet.

Regards
Christine Churchill

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
IT PAYS TO ADVERTISE (email:) on Friday, December 16, 2011 at 21:57:39
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Regarding the letter in which it says that breeders of Kerries are finding it difficult to sell pups. Why don't they advertise their puppies?

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Wow! (email:) on Thursday, December 15, 2011 at 14:28:32
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Cairn
comments: Dear Editor,
A friend gave me your business card at LKA after I voiced concern over the outrageous rip off that is happening when you subscribe to the locked section of Dog World. It doesn't work and is a waste of sixty pounds!

I didn't know your web site existed until I was given the card. What a brilliant site it is, with every result and judge's reports on one page. Fantastic! Your web site is like a breath of fresh air. Congratulations.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Thank You for your kind words. Ed.]

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Lyndia Salmon (email:windygap.kerries@virgin.net) on Tuesday, December 13, 2011 at 20:07:04
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: In reply to your breed notes, I was surprised at the comments that you made about Mrs Munro. I read her column again after reading your comments and how you can read into it that she is jealous of other people s success astounds me.

Mrs Munro has always run a small kennel, with continuing success. Although she hasn t not shown a large quantity of dogs this year, she has made up 2 champions, and has another one sitting on 2 tickets, so what has she got to be jealous of.

As far as your comment about the bitter break up between her and her partner, surely that is something that is private between the two of them. In her column she referred to breeders in Wales and Yorkshire and as far as I know, her ex-partner has not moved to either of these places.

With regard to the number of puppies being bred, several people that I have spoken to have brought up the fact that there are difficulties in selling pups, and that they are delaying breeding because of this fact. Everybody is entitled to their opinion without somebody being vindictive about them.

No doubt some people will say that I am writing this because I am friendly with Mrs. Munro, but I feel that the breed notes should be about the breed and not a vendetta against the DW breed correspondent.

Lyndia Salmon
submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ Reading the above letter one would think that Mrs Munro is waiting for Rome to 'Beatify' her. However, I have known the Dog World Correspondent a lot longer than the writer. What can be made of these Kerry Blue Breed Notes when the Correspondent wrote about a Welsh Terrier. (Nothing to do with Kerry Blues)
[Dog World] Kerry Blue breed notes Who was Mrs Munro referring to? Was this not referring to her ex partner? {It prompted this response} It doesn't seem that she wanted her partnership break up kept private to me, moreover, it is a classic case of a vindictive vendetta.
Who are these breeders in Wales and Yorkshire? - When she (Munro) refers to these Breeders and locations Mrs Munro is clearly quoting from other breed notes.
A quote from the same Kerry Notes that is about about our breed: " But to ask just a couple of questions; firstly its nigh impossible to show (particularly in a numerically small breed) more than a few dogs of the same breed at any given time so why the desire to constantly breed on an average of every four to eight weeks?" - Who is the Dog World writer referring to; it's not rocket science to work out who it is.
The other point in question about me being vindictive and having a vendetta against the DW Breed Correspondent is open to opinion. I will point out what I see as misusing the Dog Press for ones own gratification. And I make no apology for this to the writer of the above or to Mrs Munro. Further, If the DW Correspondent would like to apologise to me in her column for telling scurrilous lies to Vincent Mitchell about me re an anonymous letter that was sent to him; I may accept it. Ed ]

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Breed Critiques (email:) on Thursday, December 01, 2011 at 16:21:50
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Dear Terrier World,

I was amazed to actually see a Critique from the Judge Tom Johnston in Terrier World. As everyone knows this Judge has been very lax in writing and having his Critiques printed in the past.

My own feeling is that his actions now are a direct consequence of your web site naming and shaming those who cannot be bothered to honor their judging contracts.

Well done to Terrier World for doing what the other big two publications and the Kennel Club have turned a blind eye to for years.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
just a warning (email:) on Tuesday, October 11, 2011 at 10:55:42
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Warning: be careful if you visit the Arkama web site and view the Guest book.

I think that it has been compromised, there are hundreds of links on it. Be warned, if you click on these links you may experience something that you hadn't bargained for.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Kevin Colwill (email:kevincolwill@supanet.com) on Sunday, October 02, 2011 at 15:53:06
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: The United Kennel Club in America ban professional handlers and actively promote novice owners having a go in the ring. Could/should that happen here?

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Angry (email:none) on Friday, September 30, 2011 at 18:20:00
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Dear Terrier World, I would just like to inform anybody who is contemplating taking a subscription for the Dog World sections that are now locked up. Don't Bother!

When Dog World's site was completely free, the show reports and breed notes pages were difficult to access, with the pages continually not loading and timing out.

Now that dog World requires a subscription to access these pages one would assume that they would have sorted this out. They haven't it's exactly the same and they charge £60.00 to boot!

They may offer the feeble excuse that it's your computer or your broadband. This is nonsense. I have tried to load the pages with the latest i7 processor and the fastest broadband available; even on Apple Computers in stores, all with the same result. Save your money!

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(Name And Email Supplied) on Tuesday, September 20, 2011 at 10:53:35
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Border
comments: Un Published Critiques.

May I ask those exhibitors with missing critiques for their breed, especially those from the serial offender judges who judge yearly and never bother to write a critique.

Contact the relevant Society and the KC . The KC will write to the judge asking for a copy. If enough people from enough breeds do this, then sooner or later this will hopefully raise a flag at the KC and make them uphold the regulations on submitting critiques. Maybe if they stop future appointments until past critiques are submitted..

The societies have a binding contract with these judges and yet they invite them year after year when the judges are openly breaching the contract. Complain to the Societies!

Mr Tom Johnson is the main one he is judging numerous different breeds in consecutive years & often at the same shows and yet never bothers to produce a critique.

Exhibitors - Write to the Societies & the KC now and stop this bad practice in its tracks! if you complain they will have to act!

In 2011 the same practice is operating once more Mr Johnson has failed to submit a critique after judging at Paignton
(This letter has been amended at the request of the contributer) Ed.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Name Supplied (email: Supplied) on Saturday, August 27, 2011 at 15:44:16
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Soft Coated Wheaten
comments: There is far too much potential for those who are so inclined to abuse the system, by having Professional handlers also judging.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
anonymous on Sunday, August 21, 2011 at 11:37:23
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Dandie Dinmont
comments: With reference to the repeated wins by a 'Professional Handler' with the mustard Dandie in Breed classes, Terrier groups etc.

It would appear that The Emperor has new clothes is running rampant.

This is a pretty example of the breed who shows well, but has some basic faults which are easily seen on closer inspection and when moving. Maybe the gentleman is doing the winning not the bitch!!!

Entries for shows are falling in this vulnerable breed, and is it any wonder when with enough money one can not only buy a Champion nowadays, but also a consistent group winner, thereby massaging ones ego, just by using the right face to handle the dog.

Professional handlers should not be allowed to also judge in this country, it is a conflict of interest.

This particular handler is judging Best in Show at Crufts 2013 what a coincidence!!!!!!!

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
NONE (NONE) on Wednesday, August 10, 2011 at 12:39:52
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Scottish
comments: Dear Sir, I traveled down to Bournemouth at great expense in 2010 to exhibit under Tom Johnston.

He did not have a critique in the dog press to my knowledge. How does this judge get away with it? It would be interesting to know if he has ever written a critique on the breeds that he has judged.

Is there anyone out there that has read a critique from this judge in any breed? He does an extraordinary amount of judging,

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by A Muat.
(email:) on Thursday, August 04, 2011 at 18:52:57
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Please if you do not possess any knowledge of the dog in a natural environment don't comment it makes you look silly, the dogs try to lift a hare, the KBT would never have the ability to take a hare.

Hide and seek the dogs are Pushing and Lifting pheasant, they leave the ground to see if the bird stops, if it does not, they carry on pushing (the bird did not stop) figure it out - waiting for a bolt. (ignorance is bliss)

submit: submit
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ Your comments are lost on the 'Anonymous' writer who clearly doesn't have any knowledge about working any type of dog. I suspect that the 'Anonymous' writer is one of the clique that is circumventing the rules to get around the Docking Ban. They attempt to mock you whilst taking the cowards way out and not identifying themselves. This 'Letters' section will always respect anonymity for the right reasons. However someone who tries to belittle a genuine poster hiding behind anonymity is a coward. ]

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Name And Email Supplied: on Sunday, July 31, 2011 at 18:58:39
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Parsons Russell
comments: Dear Sir/Madam,
Having perused your list of judges that have not submitted critiques, I wish to add to that list. I have had it confirmed by Dog World & Our Dogs that Mr Tom Johnston didn't submit a critique for PRT's at National Terrier 2009 or Manchester 2011 (thus far).

He also judged PRT's at Welsh KC 2007 but I cannot remember if he submitted one for that show. I hope this information is useful. [We are well aware of Mr Tom Johnston's blatant disregard for Kennel Club Regulation Regulation F(1) 22-D ] Ed.

Kind regards,

Name And Email Supplied
submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by To Tony Muatt
(email:) on Monday, August 01, 2011 at 18:00:15
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: On your First point Tony Firstly, I would like to apologise to anyone who I caused offence to

Yes your breed notes where offensive because they where a generalisation. It would have been better and fairer to name the dogs and breeders to which you allude.

Second point from you all I did was try and defend the dogs I have owned and loved for 42 years

I see no defence of the breed here. I found it an all out attack on others.

Third point You know the problem the editor pointed out, the pitter patter movement, can you enlighten us on that?

The editorial mentioned Pitter Patter movement therefore I fell no need to enlighten the subject, I didnt bring the term up.

Fourth point I try to defend the breed you attack it, try to belittle my knowledge. I told you hares squat.

I give way to your superior knowledge of Hares.

Next point You say the dog won't go in the long grass that it is after some sort of scent, what's that all about? If it was in there the dog would be in there

Okay, where is the Hare? Did your dogs find it ?

Next look at the other video long grass different scent. Try and understand it .

Great video, very amusing. I love to see Kerry Blues play Hide and Go Seek Or is that the path the Hares took?

Next point. As for the worth of the noses, by the way there's a 11 year old out with us here Lescariot Magical Milly, a true kerry. For you to cast a doubt on the ability to scent is a joke

Again where is the Hare?

Next point You tried to degrade them, "running round like a headless chicken." I think you owe me an apology.

Yes I am sorry I didn t see the Hare.

Next point, Could you name and show us your dogs? Name and email if you are a good person and have nothing to hide then don't hide .

The letters page is as it is and as long as it is a from non disclosed contributors I will keep the closed option.

Next point , Incidentally two of these dog's noses saved a 45 min old baby's life by working the rough woodland

Very commendable that this young life was saved and the Baby, I m sure will be eternally grateful.

Last point(Thank God) looking forward to hearing from you and your explanations of the editors questions.

I don t feel any need to answer the editors questions, he s probably right in his observations.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by tony muat (montealtos@hotmail.co.uk)
on Friday, July 29, 2011 at 12:43:06
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Firstly, I would like to apologise to anyone who I caused offence to, all I did was try and defend the dogs I have owned and loved for 42 years.

You know the problem the editor pointed out, the pitter patter movement, can you enlighten us on that?
I try to defend the breed you attack it, try to belittle my knowledge. I told you hares squat.

You say the dog won't go in the long grass that it is after some sort of scent, what's that all about? If it was in there the dog would be in there. look at the other video long grass different scent. Try and understand it, but as you say you don't understand the dog in a natural environment, so its not worth explaining it to you.

As to going in rough cover watch the other video. As for the worth of the noses, by the way there's a 11 year old out with us here Lescariot Magical Milly, a true kerry. For you to cast a doubt on the ability to scent is a joke. You tried to degrade them, "running round like a headless chicken."

I think you owe me an apology. Could you name and show us your dogs? Name and email if you are a good person and have nothing to hide then don't hide.

Incidentally two of these dog's noses saved a 45 min old baby's life by working the rough woodland.

looking forward to hearing from you and your explanations of the editors questions.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by manning writes them
(email:) on Friday, July 22, 2011 at 18:34:01
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: To the Editor who I don't think will print this.

I think that Tony Manning write all these letters , we are not fooled.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[What makes you think that I write all of the comments that are published here? I didn't write yours, so there's one gone out of the equation. My letters and comments are on this site, but they are only on the Front Page and in the Kerry Blue Breed Notes You Gobshite.]

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Loophole
(email:) on Friday, July 22, 2011 at 15:32:40
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Dear Editor, in reply to the writer on Friday, July 22, 2011 at 13:19:00

I would assume that the writer of those comments is the person who uses the loophole to dock his dogs.

If he thinks that it is ethical to use this bending of the rules, would he tell the rest of us who also dislike our breed undocked how to do it? Then we can all be on the same platform.

submit: submit
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted byReply To Tony Muatt
(email:) on Friday, July 22, 2011 at 13:19:00
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Tony, First of all I do not engage in any form of animal abuse, either Bushing ,Baiting or Killing. I suppose that you feel that you are doing no harm by flushing Hares.

In saying that I do believe that a Kerry should behave in a confident way. Head held high, Alert expression, Tail erect and also move with Purpose and Coordination.

Covering ground in no way covers the way the Kerry is moving in the video. Its more like a bouncing gallop. The dog is following what it believes to be some sort of scent and only moves within the low grassed areas at no point does it venture beyond into the longer rough. The Hare that it is looking for might be in there somewhere ?

You mention that your dog is undocked. Realistically it is not going to suffer any damage in the short grass. Perhaps in the rough areas damage might occur but also damage might occur to other parts of its body. I am happy enough to have an undocked dog but cosmetically I would prefer a shorter tail.

I would defend the right for someone to dock and when loopholes are there, who can blame someone for using them.

Also Tony your abusive posting only demeans you, not me

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Docking Ban
(email:) on Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 20:36:54
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Dear letters, I would like to comment on what the writer T. Muat July 20, 2011 at 17:24:10 said. In his comments he says, "Is it only working show dogs that need to be docked now?."

I see Kerry Blue Terriers in the show ring that are clearly docked. As I understand it there is a loophole to get around the docking ban if you have land and your dogs are working Terriers. Just what work would these breeders who dock be using their dogs for?

All of the rest of us have to comply with the ban, why are these breeders getting away with it?

A classic example of this are the Torum dogs. To my knowledge this owner doesn't have any land to work dogs, he lives in the arse end of Liverpool next to a youth hostel, yet his dogs are all docked. would he even know how to work a dog?

So the question T Muat asked "Is it only working show dogs that need to be docked now?." is a very good one.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by reply
(email:) on Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 16:56:02
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Dear Editor, I would like to reply to the poster of: Sunday, July 17, 2011 at 15:14:14.

You say "Come on be fair" are you expecting exhibitors to take that remark seriously? Are the people who hire Mr Corish buying wins?

I would like someone to tell me why perfectly competent handlers who are excellent at presentation would employ an extremely expensive handler?

Or is it a case of big wins equals massive money offered from abroad?

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Cheats Shouldn't Prosper
(email:) on Thursday, July 21, 2011 at 16:07:18
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Dear Editor, I have recently read in Dog World that there is to be an 'Audience With
Di Johnson' Hosted by Andrew Brace, costing £12.50.

Di Johnson along with her husband Carl was banned by the Kennel Club for cheating, by lying on their KC questionnaires about their judging CV.

Many honest aspiring judges were astounded at the time by the rapid rise up the judging ladder by those two cheats and they were quite correctly banned by the KC.

I wouldn't give a shilling to listen to self promotion by a pompous woman.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Tony Muat (montealtos@hotmail.co.uk) on Wednesday, July 20, 2011 at 17:24:10
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Response to the reply to my letter in kerry blue breed notes.
Dear writer you seem to have concern on a lot of issues, except you don't point out that the dog on the video is undocked working a natural environment.

Or is it only working show dogs that need to be docked now?. Anyway are you MAD, 1920?

Watch the video again ,this dog is covering ground, if you know what your on about you should know the dog was trying to lift a Hare not a hand held rabbit , a hare will squat it does not go to ground, different scent, clever dog? When a dog has it's head well up it is looking for its quarry the same as gaze hounds pushing around trying to lift their quarry.

2011 v 1920 The 1920 video is a Plastic environment, hand held rabbit, plywood badger, putting a badger in a man made stop, do we still keep badgers in underground kennels? Those men and yourself - if you do the same - are putting all the animals through torture and that is all they are doing, it is not a Natural Environment, it's man made, making all the animals suffer dog, badger and rabbit frustrated - pure cruelty. What pet shop do you buy your rabbits from?

My animal is not bred to catch the quarry it is pushing, to lift the hare from a Natural Environment. Natural instinct, when a dog has been taken out from a young age it is not taught to do it. It is Natural, not plastic 1920s.

By the way how old are you, which one are you in the 1920 video? Are you the one holding the rabbit?
Go on you rotten little unter.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Breed Notes 17/07/2011 (email:) on Tuesday, July 19, 2011 at 15:22:52
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: I have just read "Kerry Blue Breed Notes" The writer goes on about incorrect movement in the breed and the lack of "Working Knowledge" and fitness of Kerry Blue Exhibitors.

May concern is the video clip that seems to be linked to the notes. The video shows a Kerry Blue running about like a "Headless Chicken" or a dog that is about to "Have a Dump". Is the video meant to depict a Kerry at Work ?

My observations on the dog in the video are as follows. The dog is hop skipping and jumping all over the place furthermore the dog is of very dubious temperament, continualy throught the clip the dog's tail is not carried correctly. To me an obvious sign of soft temperament. I would say that the dog in the video would have difficult showing it's attributes as a show dog.

I have seen a news reel taken from the 1920's "Rabits and Badgers" in it you can see a kerry following the scent of a rabit, look at that dogs demeanor and compare it with the one in the breed note video. Also watch the two dogs that go to Ground. One up for the job and the other shying away from the hole.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
To Steve Dean (email:) on Monday, July 18, 2011 at 18:43:16
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Dear letters,
there is a video on the Dog world site with various exhibitors who are asked; If you could ask the new Charman of the KC what would you like him to change, what would it be?

I wish they would have asked me. My question would be, Why don't you do away with the practice of allowing professional handlers to judge? Because Mr Dean, the smell of the dreck that comes from this is putrid.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by industrial scale
(email:) on Sunday, July 17, 2011 at 21:13:50
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: What are we saying here, a handler who has no preparation to do on a dog, doesn't see it from one show to the next, then takes it off its owner (who is excellent at presentation and a competent handler) walks into the ring, Gets the CC, Best of Breed, a group win and then Best in Show, and he then gets in excess of £500.00 from the owner plus expenses even though he hasn't brought the dog to the show and he keeps any dog food vouchers to boot? It stinks!

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by What proof?
(email:) on Sunday, July 17, 2011 at 15:14:14
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Dear Editor, Is the writer - of breed kerry blue - suggesting that handler Corish is being practically nodded through when he exhibits?

Come on get real. If he is we are talking about wrongdoing on an industrial scale here; surely not?

I will admit that he is not a handler in the conventional sense and I know that he doesn't appear to have any involvement other than exhibiting the dog, but come on be fair.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by The real issue
(email:) on Sunday, July 17, 2011 at 14:54:42
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: I also think that there was a red herring planted. Surely the obvious questions that need to be asked are these: Why are Professional Handlers allowed by the KC to Judge? It is open to corruption and in my veiw it is already steeped in it.

The new Chairman of the KC should look at this practice because it is just not on.

We now have Geoff Corish in our breed handling on a regular basis. We have had two owners who have used this handler and they have had amazing success when Geoff Corish has handled their dogs. Both owners prepare the dogs for Mr Corish, all that he does is take them into the ring.

Considering that both of these owners have excellent presentation skills and are extremely good handlers themselves. So the question that begs is, why do they need to employ the most expensive handler in dogs just to trot the dogs around the ring?

Is it because Mr Corish wines and dines with all of the group and best in show judges when he is judging?

It stinks to high heaven. So come on new Chairman Dean, clean this stinking mess up for the sake of honest exhibitors, without them there will be no dog shows.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Wrong Debate
(email:) on Saturday, July 16, 2011 at 10:16:58
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Fox (wire)
comments: Dear Letters, this spat between the recent contributors looks like a red herring to me.

The real issue here is twofold which was asked in the lead article on the home page. Should professional handlers be allowed to judge and does Geoff Corish get looked on favorably in and out of the ring.

For my money he does. It is like the story of the Emperor with no clothes on, everyone can see he's naked but all are afraid to speak out.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Keith Jones (email:keithjonesdarlaur@msn.com) on Saturday, July 16, 2011 at 06:43:55
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Fox (smooth)
comments: I have nothing to apologise for, you have been afforded an opportunity to reveal your name and put your case forward but refuse, this leads me to believe that you have something to hide, butenough of your red flag waving, I will not respond anymore to someone who hides behind anonymity.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Robins not Good (email:robin.loxely@gmail.com) on Friday, July 15, 2011 at 20:44:06
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Fox (smooth)
comments: Sir, I know that handlers work within the rules. But what did the writer mean when he said that handlers "do even worse things" his words not mine.

Would he like to apologise for saying that, or has he forgot that he wrote it?

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Keith Jones (keithjonesdarlaur@msn.com) on Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 20:58:44
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Fox (smooth)
comments: Who said anything about discussing it in private, you can have an open forum if you want
(I take it that you would not want that seeing that you won't put your name to your e mails).

I take it from your e mail (you handle them occasionally) maybe you are a professional handler.

You suggest that the professional handler does things illegally (your words not mine) all the handlers who I know work within the rules set by the K.C.

if you were to ask is some of this work carried out is unethical I would have to say yes, so unless the K.C. changes the rules about professional handlers judging it will remain.

You seem to think that I have a hatred of handlers I do not, I have what I think is a good relationship with them,and all of them I know would discuss this issue with me head on not hide behind a nom de plume.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Robin's Good (email:robin.loxely@gmail.com) on Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 19:33:55
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Fox (smooth)
comments: Sir, the writer who said that some handlers 'do even worse things' doesn't seem to want to reveal what he apparently knows of wrong doing by the Pro Handling fraternity.

He made the the assertion of wrong doing, yet when challenged he wants to discuss it in private.

I say again if he knows of such goings on he should say what it is or keep his trap shut.

No I'm not a breeder of smooths but have handled them occasionally.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Keith Jones (keithjonesdarlaur@msn.com) on Thursday, July 14, 2011 at 16:05:50
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Fox (smooth)
comments: Robin Hood why not your real name, what are you hiding? Please feel free to approach me at any show you see me to debate the issue, should not be hard seeing that your breed is S.F.T.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Robin Hood (email:robin.loxely@gmail.com) on Wednesday, July 13, 2011 at 21:39:47
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Fox (smooth)
comments: Sir, it is interesting that the writer who suggested that some handlers 'do even worse things' other than handling, hasn't come back here to elaborate on his statement.

If he is pointing the finger at handlers doing something illegal, he should say what it is, name the handlers, or keep his trap shut.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(email:) on Tuesday, July 12, 2011 at 22:34:08
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Sir, reading the comments re pro handlers judging I must say that surely there is an underlying temptation for those who judge to look after their fellow professionals.

Handlers get paid to prepare a dog and exhibit under a judge. If they win say a cc and best of breed and then perhaps a group win, their fees increase dramatically.

You scratch my back I'll scratch yours? Handlers should not judge and handle.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(email:) on Tuesday, July 12, 2011 at 17:02:30
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: West Highland White
comments: Dear Editor,

I read Keith Jones' letter with interest. He asks the question "why is it that only ever G. Corish is mentioned, why not other professional terrier handlers who do the same thing and sometimes worse."

As far as I'm aware it was this man who set the precedent for Handlers to judge. Also I don't know of any other handlers who judge Best In Show at General Championship shows on a regular basis, do you?
But I am sure that they will soon follow their 'Leader'.

What does the writer of that letter mean when he says "And sometimes worse"?

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted byKeith Jones (email:keithjonesdarlaur@msn.com) on Tuesday, July 12, 2011 at 08:43:46
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Fox (smooth)
comments: To give a balanced account to the professional handler judging debate why is it that only ever G. Corish is mentioned, why not other professional terrier handlers who do the same thing and sometimes worse.

The ball is in the exhibitors court if he is judging and you think that this is unfair don't enter.

I am not in favour of professional handlers judging but until the K.C. do something about it I am afraid we are stuck with it.I have shown under G. Corish (in the group stage) and I have always found him fair.

I have no objection if you would like to print my name. Great site very informative.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
another breed (email: not terriers) on Saturday, July 09, 2011 at 16:12:28
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Letters: Editor, I think that the people who are having a go at Geoff Corish are just jealous of him.

I exhibit in another breed group but I use this site because it is most informative in certain areas and easy to navigate.

Geoff Corish may be the most expensive handler around but he does get the results.

A lot of dogs would never have won a cc never mind a group if Geoff hadn't handled them.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(email:) on Friday, July 08, 2011 at 18:30:45
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: I would just like to say that pro handlers judging is a disgrace and open to corruption.

Handlers are paid on results and the bigger the result the greater the payment, so they all look after one another.

Come on Squeaky Clean Professor Steve Dean, clean up this stinking fish smell that is gaining momentum and pungency as more and more handlers join the judging circuit. Or is it that the fish is rotting from the head down?

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Not Naive (email:none) on Friday, July 08, 2011 at 13:24:43
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: West Highland White
comments: Dear Editor, Does the writer of the letter suggesting that Geoff Corish is "The best out there" need a brain transplant?

Geoff Corish is an extremely highly paid operator who hardly ever prepares any of the dogs that he takes into the ring. Why is he so expensive when the owners prepare their own dogs?

Oh for a Pedigree Dogs Handlers Exposed/Jemima Harrison style investigation into this practice of handlers judging and exhibiting.

The majority of the terrier group judges are one big clique all dancing to the Corish melody.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(email:) on Thursday, July 07, 2011 at 22:46:23
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Geoff Corrish is the best terrier handler out there.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
good riddance (email:) on Monday, May 30, 2011 at 10:33:46
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Border
comments: Sir, I welcome the news that Ronnie Irving is to step down as Chairman of The Kennel Club.

I wonder what brought about this decision from him; is he jumping before he is pushed? It is a strange decision considering that he fought tooth and nail - along with his 'KC Sycophants' - against the proposal last year from Robin Searle that a fixed term for the Chairmanship should operate in the Kennel Club.

Of course he will claim - is claiming - in his resignation letter that the Kennel Club policy on Health and Welfare has never been stronger.
But, wasn't this brought about by the fallout from the BBC Documentary 'Pedigree Dogs Exposed'; does he really want us to think that Health and Welfare improvements were brought about as a consequence of his leadership?

His crass arrogant remarks when questioned about in-breeding should have brought about his resignation immediately after the BBC documentary.
At that time the Kennel Club were not leading by example, they were - after the documentary - frantically trying to put out damage limitation propaganda and being dragged along by the 'Tsunami' of outraged public opinion.

Good riddance to an arrogant chairman of The Kennel Club.

submit: submit

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Judges Critiques (email:) on Friday, May 13, 2011 at 17:45:37
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Dear Editor, here is some information that may be of use to your writers who have not had a Critique published. It is taken from the Kennel Club's website. Questions and Answers: ( Q: A: )

Judges and Judging General Enquiries

Q. What is a critique and why does a judge need to supply a critique?

A. A critique is a written report completed by the judge, where he/she will outline the relative virtues and weaknesses of the dogs they have judged at a show, and explaining why they have chosen one dog above another. Exhibitors really want to see them as they want to know what a judge thought about their dog.
They are sent to the 2 dog papers; Dog World and Our Dogs, and are printed along with the results.
The KC recognised that some judges weren't supplying critiques to the dog press and brought in a regulation in July 2004, which states that judges must submit critiques for the first two placings in each class at Championship shows and Open Breed Shows.

Q. I haven't seen a copy of the critique for a show I entered - what should I do?

A. Once the exhibitor has written to the Kennel Club, we will write to the judge and ask them for a copy of the critique. Once we have received it, we shall send a copy onto the exhibitor. If a judge isn't able to send a critique we will warn them that they have to keep critiques in future. If they fail to supply critiques after being warned the matter is referred to the SEC and they may be fined.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(email:) on Friday, May 13, 2011 at 15:09:13
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Sir,
I sometimes wonder if judges don't send a critique in because they can't justify their placings.....??

submit: submit

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Enlightened (email:) on Thursday, April 14, 2011 at 19:09:15
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Soft Coated Wheaten
comments: Dear Letters Editor, I must say that your page for exposing Judges who do not send in a Critique is an eye opener.

I had been waiting for a critique for Wheatens at South Wales 10 judged by Tom Johnston and thought that I must have missed it in the dog press. It appears that this judge never sends in a Critique!

I think that he should be severely reprimanded by the KC or suspended.

It costs a considerable amount of money to enter and travel to a show these days and Judges should fulfil their contracts and not cheat exhibitors by not submitting a Critique. I am very angry.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Hanged, drawn and quartered (email:) on Thursday, April 14, 2011 at 14:09:31
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Dear Editor,

I have read with interest previous letters regarding Judges who did not have their Show Reports published in one of the UK Canine publications.

Some of the letter writers believe this to be in contravention of Kennel Club rulings.

The fact is that the wording actually reads as follows All Judges at Championship Shows and Open Breed Club Shows must produce a written critique for the first two placings in each class, and will dispatch these to at least one of the weekly United Kingdom Canine journals. Source KC Website.

No rules are breached if a judge Fails to have their report published In the interests of fairness and for an unbiased piece of journalism, I believe that you have a duty as an editor or journalist to extensively research your work.

Look for published reports (this seems to be done)
Check with Canine press for unpublished reports(?)
Check with Judges who have been named in the reports (?)
Check with KC (?)

submit: submit

[ Regarding extensive research: I have no intention of contacting the Canine Press for unpublished reports; the onus is not on me as Editor of Terrier World to do so. Further, I will not be contacting lazy judges who do not fulfill their contracts. (as is required by the Kennel Club) And your last point 'Check with the KC' what for?
I assume that you are one of the 'Unpublished Judges'. The last show of the season (Gen Ch Show) was LKA and in your breed you listed Kerry Blue. LKA was the second week in December 2010 and the replacement Judge was Ron Ramsay for Geoff Corish who could not officiate. Mr Ramsay has not had a Critique published for the appointment that he agreed to take on. This show incidentally is not the first one that has gone unpublished for him. Since LKA 10 it is five months past; more than enough time (for Mr Ron Ramsay) to 'Critique' fifteen dogs and bitches in total don't you think?
As for the Kennel Club Regulation Booklet; what part of 'Regulation' do you not understand? Ed.]

REGULATION F1 22-D

d. All Judges at Championship Shows and Open Breed Club Shows must
produce a written critique for the first two placings in each class, and
will dispatch these to at least one of the weekly United Kingdom Canine
journals.
e. When requested to do so, judges must submit a completed breed health
monitoring report form and a copy of their critique to the Kennel Club
within 21 days of the close of the show.
f. All judging contracts are subject to cancellation at the discretion of
the Kennel Club in the event of the judge being subject to relevant
disciplinary action.
g. In the event of a Judge or Society being in breach of any of the terms
of a judging contract, the General Committee may impose a fine. The
Judge or Society may be required by the General Committee to give
reasons for such breach, and in the event of the explanation not being
considered satisfactory, the General Committee may impose a fine.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Walkies! (email:) on Wednesday, April 13, 2011 at 19:14:54
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Dear Letters, the article about 'Professional Dog Walkers' in the 'Read the latest items' column on the front page could not be any better placed. Because, it's right in line with the most expensive Professional Dog Walker of all time.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
To Editor (email:) on Sunday, April 10, 2011 at 13:54:59
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Editor,

I think that you've overstepped the mark once too often by printing the judge's names. You are becoming more viscous in your comments and really don't deserve a place in dogs along with your disgusting website.

I for one will not read it again!! This won't be printed!!

submit: submit

[Why wouldn't your comments be published? Actually, I appreciate your observations; I was worrying that I may be losing my touch. Ed.]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Unfair Advantage (email:) on Friday, April 08, 2011 at 22:04:20
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Dear Letters,

Sir, I read your article "legally-docked dog owners are continuing with their protest" in the 'Read the latest items' column on the front and it gave me food for thought.

It is clear that some breeders are ignoring the docking ban and have found a way - or loophole around it - and they are exploiting it. This is unfair on the rest of us who conform to the ban.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Judges (email:none) on Friday, April 08, 2011 at 16:29:04
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: To Terrier World.

Dear Sir, I think that your page for reports that are not printed is a bit unfair. Surely this will be a black mark against those particular judges?

They should be approached and given a chance to submit the reports. Concerned.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Critique (email:) on Thursday, April 07, 2011 at 12:50:51
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Dear Editor,

I have browsed your 'Letters' section occasionally and found it most entertaining.

Reading the Data that has recently been printed about Judges who do not bother sending in critiques amazed me.

In the days when there was only the dog press, if a Judge didn't write a critique we forgot about it in the end.

Your expose of those Judges is a very good idea. Would it be possible to have a permanent section for future reference? This would then I'm sure, assist societies in their invitations to Judges and also encourage Judges to fulfill their judging contracts that are required by the KC.

Thank you for your very good informative web site.

submit: submit
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[I will consider your request Ed.]

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Judges Reports (email:) on Wednesday, April 06, 2011 at 12:10:13
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Dear Terrier World, here are the results of my research for Judges who failed to have their reports published in the Dog Press as is required by the Kennel Club

RESEARCH FOR JUDGING REPORTS UNPUBLISHED ALL TERRIER BREEDS 2010
(Correct at time of publication Ed.)

AIREDALE:
BLACKPOOL 10: MRS ELAIN BALDWIN

AUSTRALIAN:
SKC MAY 10: FRANK KANE
BLACKPOOL 10: JEFF LUSCOTT

BORDER:
PAIGNTON 10: MRS C CLUMBARD

BULL ENGLISH:
SOUTH WALES 10: MR TOM JOHNSTON

MINI BULL:
LEEDS 10: MR D GILMORE
BOURNEMOUTH 10: MRS A YOUNG
DARLINGTON 10: MRS MAUREEN BELL
SOUTH WALES 10: MR TOM JOHNSTON

CAIRN:
BLACKPOOL 10: PETER CHAPPELL

CESKEY:
PAIGNTON 10: TOM JOHNSTON

DANDIE DINMONT:
SCOTTISH BREEDS 10: MR T McKENZIE
DRIFFIELD 10: Ms LIZ WALKLEY

FOX SMOOTH:
NATIONAL TERRIER 10: NEIL ADAMS

FOX WIRE:
SKC MAY 10: MRS A MAUGHAN
THREE COUNTIES 10: MISS H FRIZELL
BLACKPOOL 10: MR A WESTWOOD
EAST OF ENGLAND 10: DR A J PERTUIT JR

GLEN OF IMAAL:
EAST OF ENGLAND 10: MRS M MACDONALD CROSS

IRISH:
SKC MAY 10: MR J STEWART

KERRY BLUE:
MANCHESTER 10: MRS JULIE MOSS
PAIGNTON 10: MR TOM JOHNSTON
CITY OF BIRMINGHAM 10: MR SEAN DELMAR
RICHMOND 10: Ms EMILY BRADLEY
LKA 10: MR RON RAMSAY

LAKELAND:
BORDER UNION 10: MRS NICKY PATTERSON
CITY OF BIRMINGHAM 10: MRS CATHY DELMAR
MIDLAND COUNTIES 10: Ms BETH SWEIGART

MANCHESTER TERRIER:
THREE COUNTIES 10: MR BEN RENOLDS-FROST
MIDLAND COUNTIES 10: Ms MARGARET CLOWES

NORFOLK:
BLACKPOOL 10: MR TAN NAGRECHA
LEEDS: MRS MARION SARGENT
BOURNEMOUTH 10: MR JEFF LUSCOTT

NORWICH:
WELKS 10: MRS MARION SARGENT
CITY OF BIRMINGHAM 10: MR DAN ERICSSON
DARLINGTON 10: MR TOM JOHNSTON

PARSON RUSSELL:
CITY OF BIRMINGHAM 10: MRS CATHY DELMAR

SCOTTISH:
BOURNEMOUTH 10: MR TOM JOHNSTON

SKYE:
BLACKPOOL 10: MR ABE HARKNESS
DRIFFIELD 10: Ms CORALYNNE SMITH

SOFT COATED WHEATEN:
BATH 10: MR PAUL WILKINSON
SOUTH WALES 10: MR TOM JOHNSTON

STAFFORDSHIRE BULL:
BORDER UNION 10: MRS A DICK

WELSH:
LEEDS 10: MR TOM JOHNSTON

WEST HIGHLAND WHITE:
BLACKPOOL 10: MR JEFF LUSCOTT
WINDSOR 10: MR TOM JOHNSTON

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Very interested (email:) on Wednesday, April 06, 2011 at 15:13:51
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Soft Coated Wheaten
comments: Dear Editor,

I have just read the letter "Judges Reports" April 6.
If you get the research from the writer would it be possible to put it into Terrier World?

Thanks.

submit: submit

[I do now have the data. However, I need some time to verify the research. I will publish the results when I have finished the verification; I need to cross check from every source available. Ed.]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Judges Reports (email:) on Wednesday, April 06, 2011 at 11:53:13
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Dear Terrier World,

To say that I was disappointed at LKA 2010 would be putting it mildly.

We arrived on the day and were told that the Judge Geoff Corish had taken ill and there would be a substitute judge who turned out to be Ron Ramsay.

Personally, I would not have entered under this Judge, but as we had gone to considerable expense, we decided to exhibit as we were there. This was not a problem and our award is irrelevant.

My anger is that this judge has not taken the time (or it hasn't yet been published) to write up a report on the
dogs.

Judges must know that it is a requirement by the Kennel Club, that when you accept a judging appointment you must submit a Judge's Report to either of the two main dog publications; Dog World or Our Dogs.
Kennel Club Regulation: F(1) 22-D

I have done some research on this matter for 2010 and I am amazed at the amount of judges that do not send in reports. Judges Reports are a directive and a rule (regulation Ed) from the KC that when you undertake a contract to judge you must provide a Report.

I can if you wish forward my research results - all 26 Terrier Breeds - for you to put on your site. I think that exhibitors should know who they are and also the Kennel Club should be made aware and contact these Judges as to why they have not complied with their rules (regulations Ed) when they entered into a judging contract.

submit: submit

[Certainly forward me your research, it will make interesting reading. Ed.]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(email:) on Monday, April 04, 2011 at 19:34:33
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Hello There Tony,

I have been reading with interest your page on the Terrier World Website on the Kerry Blue breed notes, as someone who is interested in helping to save this vulnerable breed I am aghast at what I have found out from doing a bit of research.

I have found that what you have said on this page to be true, most of the breeders that I have sent enquiries to have endorsed puppies, which is no good to me as I would like my bitch to have a least one litter of puppies, to help keep the breed going.

Now I am not one of those unscrupulous people who would just breed for money and there are plenty out there, I am an honest descent person trying to help out this breed and I would do all my homework to find the right stud dog to breed from without any inbreeding, as I hope that most people out there do.

Now if like me most people do their research they will hopefully be able to weed out these unreputable nasty breeders.

I also fancied showing but have been put off that idea as I get the feeling it s not about the puppy but more about who you know!


Keep up the good work and many thanks

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(email:) on Friday, March 11, 2011 at 00:01:15
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Border
comments: Dear Terrier World, I must congratulate your staff for producing the most comprehensive web site for Terriers that I have come across.

The navigation is easy and I think that everything that you would want to know about Terriers - and more - is there.

It is wonderful to see the results and the judges reports for each breed on one page. It has to now be my first port of call, my number one site.

Congratulations once again to all of the Terrier World Staff.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Thank You For Your Kind Words. Terrier World Staff Totals One; Editor.]

(Some visitors show their appreciation by visiting our Sponsors {Adverts} this gives Terrier World a tiny amount of revenue with each advert clicked; and cost you nothing.)

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(email:) on Tuesday, March 08, 2011 at 15:48:34
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Thanks very much for the info ,regarding bloodlines . Will do my research now and look into pedigree's

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
information (email:) on Tuesday, March 08, 2011 at 11:25:30
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Welsh
comments: To the poster from on Friday, March 04, 2011 at 19:11:17 who wants to know what the bloodlines are for the Welsh Terriers that is causing so much debate?

Visit the Kebulak website, use your intelligence and work it out.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


(email:) on Sunday, March 06, 2011 at 16:45:16
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Welsh
comments: Dear Letters, In answer to the new? Poster Count Duckula.

You say that: "One of two things might happen. The teeth seperate , quarry escapes. Teeth seperate and jaw gets ripped out."

'Might' isn't 100 percent is it, and how would you know that this 'might' happen? What experience have you got working dogs with a reverse 'Scissor Bite' as is described in your link?: www.dentalvet.com/patients/orthodontics/pet_orthodontics.htm

I had one that was undershot. I worked it when it wasn't so frowned upon to do so, because it wouldn't have won in the ring. It never let me down, never lost a quarry and its jaw remained with it until it died, - of natural causes.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Count Duckula (email:) on Sunday, March 06, 2011 at 13:35:24
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: To Welsh. That is the problem with the termonology used by Breeders and Exhibitors.

Yes overshot bite is wrong for a terrier. Most desired is a normal scissors bite.

A reverse scissors bite no mater what the degree may be accepatable in other breeds is not so in terriers (I am open to correction on this) I will post a link for you all to read at your own leisure, this will explaine bites better than I can.

The reason that any form of underbite is wrong for me is this. One of the things a Kerry Blue does(sorry used to do) is pull its quary from the ground. Now a correct bite the forward teeth are attached to the skull of the dog. Pull on these and the whole dog stays put or moves forward.

Now lets say the lower teeth are forward to any degree of the upper teeth. Pull on these and what happens.The lower jaw is more moveable and weaker and has the potential to move forward.

One of two things might happen. The teeth seperate , quarry escapes. Teeth seperate and jaw gets ripped out.

Here is link to experts view on dentition from a health point: www.dentalvet.com/patients/orthodontics/pet_orthodontics.htm

And as to me being Ron Ramsey. No hes a much better singer.

submit: submit

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(email:) on Sunday, March 06, 2011 at 10:10:09
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Welsh
comments: Dear Letters, in answer to the person who signed themselves Count Dracula, yes I am serious about an undershot mouth being the reverse of the Scissor Bite.

Where the bottom teeth fit tightly and in front of the top teeth, this is a reverse bite. And who are we to say that this is not as affective as a scissor bite when holding quarry?

Of course there will be some cases where lower jaw protrudes further. The word undershot is a general term for all bites that are forward of the top teeth.

An overshot mouth can never be excused because there is a gap between the teeth.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(email:) on Sunday, March 06, 2011 at 08:50:15
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Sir, after reading the letter from the person who signed in as "Count Dracula" it immediately jumped out at me who this is.

Only one person in our breed Kerry Blue Terriers has such a high opinion of himself to reply to three contributors at once. Yes, it is the man who talks down and at you rather than to you. The self appointed expert who's lines are now in reverse gear.

I would like to ask him to explain how he is getting away with docking his dogs when the rest of us have to conform to the docking ban. The Kennel Club should be asked to investigate him and let us all know why he is allowed to get away with it.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Count Dracula (email:) on Saturday, March 05, 2011 at 20:44:00
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: (Undershot is the reverse of what is commonly accepted as a Scissor Bite)Are you serious? And you say you are a judge. Undershot is not just a reverse scissor bite just the same as overshot is not just a scissor bite.

The only bites allowed in my breed are Scissor and Level. And as Ms Davani's Vet describing the mouth fault in the puppy as "Cosmetic" faulty bites are not just cosmetic they can cause the dog pain throughout its life.

And just to mention the breed notes in dog world. A good journalist would check their sources and also allow the accused to put their story across. Did not seem to happen in this case and just comes across as a poisin pen.

Editor you where quite right in commenting on the article in DW but once again you debased your article with a sideways snipe at Geoff Corish.

The only ones responisable for the DW article are the breed note writer and their editor. Why did you feel the need to somehow aportion blame to someone not involved?

Its like a dog that attacks a target , cant reach and then bites something else in the process.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[I didn't feel the need; I did because I can. Corish has spoken a lot of his Chinese whispers about me. He is an Infestation in Kerry Blue Terriers and I regard him as the Maggot that he is. And probably had plenty of money from you. Editor]

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(email:) on Saturday, March 05, 2011 at 11:39:49
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Welsh
comments: To Terrier World Letters:

Dear Editor, I have been reading the letters and following the breed notes looking for information regarding Ms Davani's letter to the press.

I find it astonishing that a breed correspondent for another breed should take it upon herself to write about our breed Welsh Terriers.

This writer most certainly has an axe to grind with Ms Davani and is using our breed for what can only be
described as a spiteful attack.

Both of our Correspondents, Julien Barney and Alex Witmund have not written a word about this and quite rightly so in my opinion.

One can only conclude that the nickname Pernicious P-- is well and truly justified.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(email:) on Saturday, March 05, 2011 at 11:04:13
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Welsh
comments: Dear Letters, I would like to reply to the writer from Friday, March 04, 2011 at 18:55:41

Is this thick as two short planks writer seriously suggesting that every breeder should keep all that they breed? Name me one Kennel that has one breed or multiple that does this.

Furthermore, the writer suggests that the puppy should have been given away free? Why should it be? The RSPCA charge in the region of £200.00 for pedigree dogs and they could be geriatrics!

I have judged dogs that have been presented to me on occasions and I have come across both undershot and overshot bites; the latter being a much more serious fault in a Terrier (Undershot is the reverse of what is commonly accepted as a Scissor Bite)

There is a considerable amount of time and money spent when you embark into the world of breeding dogs and unless a dog is so seriously deformed that it will affect its quality of life, a cosmetic fault - in the eyes of the 'Show World' - it should be allowed to live.

The writer from Friday, March 04, 2011 at 18:55:41 needs a large injection of intelligence.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


 Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(email:) on Friday, March 04, 2011 at 19:11:17
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: PLEASE enlighten us which bloodlines they are. Also the well known kennel? Thankyou this will help people avoid kennel's like this.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(email:) on Friday, March 04, 2011 at 18:55:41
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: I think buyer's should be very careful, were they buy from.Mrs Davani breed's several terrier breed's,why would you breed that amount anyway unless for gain's �����. Couldn't possible keep them all could you.

Also referring to dog world/our dog breed note's i think you should have given the dog away not sell it .There again ������ come's into it .

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
nil (email:nil) on Friday, March 04, 2011 at 15:15:19
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Welsh
comments: Dear Terrier world, I followed the link from your "read more" 'Kerry Blue Breeder Hits Back at Vindictive Slur By Dog World Writer' on the front page.

I must say that the Picture that was painted by Dog World is somewhat different to the breeder's version of events although they are similar.

I would agree with the statement that the Dog World's version is vindictive and that the breeder has found it necessary to write not only here but in Dog World and Our Dogs to defend herself and her reputation as a breeder. Although the writer for Dog World represents Kerry Blue Terriers, the related notes were about
Welsh Terriers.

Has this got anything to do with the fact that Davani and Munro were once in partnership and they acrimoniously fell out?

We in Welsh Terriers all know what Bloodlines Ms Davani has and what stud dog she used. These bloodlines are from an extremely well known kennel. We must all thank the Dog World writer for enlightening us to the fact that these lines are likely to produce undershot jaws. I now wouldn't touch those lines with a barge pole.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(email:) on Friday, February 25, 2011 at 14:15:28
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: If mrs munro write's these article's about people , then she should be brave enough to name the people. Especially if she is a geninue dog lover /BREEDER ,to help promote the breed.

submit: submit
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Not If, Did Write. Read it for yourself Ed.] Click Here

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
No Need for Intros (email:) on Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 15:48:27
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
breed: Kerry Blue
comments: I have just read your latest Kerry Blue "Breed Notes" It seems to me that most of the offerings are in fact Breed notes about breed notes a few obituaries ,some self advertisements from exhibitors and a few personal rants against other exhibitors or breeders.

The Dog world breed notes have a comments section where you can reply to the breed notes. A direct comment there might be more usefull.I know the common concensus is for recycling but It would be more interesting if you could source some material by yourself.

In my opinion your rants demonise an otherwise usefull website.

submit: submit
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[You introduce yourself as "No Need For Intros". If there is no need you must think that we know who you are.
Me - Tony Manning - the writer of the Kerry Breed Notes in Terrier World - have no idea who you are. If you feel so strongly about the content in my Kerry Notes why don't you identify yourself? I would be more than happy to debate with you; in fact I will give you a dedicated page do do so. However, I would be very surprised if you do.]

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
(email:) on Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 10:44:20
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
breed: Select Breed
comments: To Letters:

Dear Editor,
reading the letters in Terrierworld has given me an interest in breeds other than my own.

Kerry Blues seem to crop up a lot and I look forward to new additions in their breed notes. Consequently, this has also brought about my interest in reading DW Kerry breed notes.

The observations of the contributor for TW are quite astute regarding DW Kerry notes. Which has made me much more aware of where the DW writer is coming from when there are notes published.

Reading the DW notes this week, 25/2/11 one can only ask, is the writer worried that exhibitors will question the Judge if she wins at the next show which can only be Crufts, or is she worried that the Judge may overlook her exhibit because he/she may not examine the dogs expertly enough?

It was a long preamble in the notes to get to the her point, 'the bottom line'.

Also, if as she states that most would not know who Stafford Somerfield was, why quote him? I remember Stafford Somerfield but I don't ever recall him judging dogs.

submit: submit
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
none (email:) on Wednesday, February 23, 2011 at 10:20:36
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
breed: Kerry Blue
comments: To TerrierWorld

Dear letters, I often read the letters on your site and find them interesting. This has taken me to the kerry blue breed notes being led there with some of the comments in the letters.

After reading the most recent kerry notes, I would agree wholeheartedly with the Terrier World writer.

It would seem to me that the breed note contributor from Dog World is not writing about the kerry blue, but about a personal dislike or a vendetta against a particular breeder.

Power of the pen is a privilege and should not be abused.

Dog World should review what their kerry representative is putting in the kerry notes and act accordingly.

submit: submit
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

(email:) on Thursday, February 10, 2011 at 15:11:28

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Dear Sir,

Reading that the Kennel Club now have a data base to record all proof of posting information supplied to it by championship shows which have had to accept entries on the day.

As a result of information extracted from that database, 34 exhibitors were contacted during 2010 to be advised that the only proof of entry which will be accepted from them in the future, will be Registered Post documentation, the show society s confirmation of receipt or an online receipt.

Failure to provide such proof by these exhibitors will result in the disqualification of awards and possible imposition of a fine, under Regulation F(1)9.e.

What next, Stocks at the Kennel Club for those stepping out of line and then pelted by Kennel club officials with rotten vegetables?

We need a Revolution in dogs and an alternative club to exhibit and pursue our hobby!

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

(email:) on Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 18:33:47

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue

comments: Professional handlers or dog walker's SHOULD not be aloud to judge at what ever level.
Especially when they show a dog, get paid for it they go and judge .

The KC need to get there act together they get enough money out of us dog lover's

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

Amazed (email:) on Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 22:36:17

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: West Highland White
comments: Dear Editor,

I really enjoy your Website as it is informative and up to date with results and Judge's reports.

I hadn't realised that there had been an addition to the site of shedules and forms for all of the general champ shows. Having easy access to all of the forthcoming shows on one page is really good.

As you know, Geoff Corish was to have judged Westies at LKA but was taken ill.

I browsed through the schedules for 2011 and I am amazed that not only was Geoff Corish supposed to judge three breeds at LKA, he is to judge three at Crufts and two at Birmingham National and I would be interested to see what else he is due to judge when the rest of the seasons schedules are available.

There has to be a conflict of interest here surely? How can the Kennel Club allow this to happen when he is a Professional Handler?

The obvious question is, does he have some sort of hold on the Chairman of the KC, Ronnie Irving? Bearing also in mind that there are rumours that he is to judge Best In Show at Crufts 2013.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

LKA (email:) on Tuesday, January 11, 2011 at 02:24:27

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: West Highland White
comments: Dear Letters,

reading the postings about LKA and the substitute judges, I visited the the Kerry Blue breed notes to see what all of the fuss is about.

Westies and Kerrys were to be judged by Geoff Corish. Unfortunately he was taken ill.
LKA contacted Maurice Marshall who judged Westies, our breed.

I find it very hard to believe that LKA would have waited for Kerry exhibitors to arrive in the hope that there would be one amongst them who would stand in and judge in place of Mr Corish.

There was only a handful of Kerry Blues for goodness sake and I think that someone is being economical with the truth. Had the replacement judge been asked the day previous as was Mr Marshall?

I think that the Kerry Blue exhibitors should rightly be outraged and they should demand their fees and expenses back. At the very least the Secretary of LKA should be asked just who was sought as a replacement for Mr Corish and when.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

None thank you (email:) on Wednesday, December 15, 2010 at 21:39:01

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Dear Editor,

I have just read the Kerry Blue Terrier breed notes and quite frankly I am disgusted. The substitute judge Mr Ramsey should be applauded for standing in at the last minute.

I think that the article in the breed notes about the judge is a disgraceful piece of journalism.

I doubt very much that you will print this. Your website is nothing short of gutter press.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

(email:Even the best plans sometimes fail) on Wednesday, December 15, 2010

at 20:31:22

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Dear letters, how ironic that the plan to give the dog from the North his first big win lay in tatters after the judge pulled out.

His breeder didn't go presumably this would have made his win seem more honest and believable had the original judge officiated .

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

(email:) on Monday, December 06, 2010 at 17:13:44

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Start a PETITION to get the chairman out if you all feel that strongly about it.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

Group And BIS (email:) on Thursday, December 02, 2010 at 12:27:46

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed

comments: Dear Editor,

I am amazed at some of the Statements that are uttered by the Chairman of The Kennel Club.

His idiotic notion that Dog Shows may be better off without Group and Best In Show competitions are quite ridiculous. If we do away with competition what is the point in dog shows at all?

Let the Kennel Club and its buffoon Chairman be the first to do this. Crufts Dog show would collapse and there would be no revenue from television.

Or is he suggesting that all of the other dog society's abandon Group and BIS and only the Kennel Club be allowed to hold these competitions?

Get real Mr Irving, you are not up to the job. Undeniably, you are the worst Chairman the Kennel Club has had in its History.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


 

Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

(email:) on Monday, November 29, 2010 at 17:09:27

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Dear Terrier World,

after reading the KC Chairman's remarks about being disappointed that only one breeder was chosen among the Founding Members of The Dog Advisory Council I was somewhat surprised.

What he really meant I suspect is that he and the other KC officials who nominated themselves didn't get chosen.

And, just what did Ronnie Irving expect after his crass remarks in the program Pedigree Dogs Exposed? If he had an ounce of conscience in him he would have resigned after that program.

What did he do instead, he fought tooth and nail to keep his position even to the point of humiliating Robin Searle for having the 'Audacity' to propose a fixed term for the Chairman's position at the Kennel Club at this years KC A.G.M. What a Rotter.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

US (email:) on Friday, November 19, 2010 at 01:40:00

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: What you need in the UK is strong leadership in your Kennel Club Board.

A Professional Handler should never be allowed to Judge, because there is a conflict of interests.

This can only lead to corruption. The bigger the name the greater the corruption.
Get smart and vote with your feet, do not enter when he judges do not exhibit when he handles.
Drive him out.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

(email:) on Tuesday, November 16, 2010 at 17:09:43

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: The winning kerry has faults like all dogs @ bitches .But when you have certain people handling the dog it could have three legs and still win.

So were do the rest of us mere novices stand on one leg???

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

(email:) on Tuesday, November 16, 2010 at 17:01:17

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: HAHA don't you mean dog walker, with the right connections .

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

The Terrier Group (email:) on Monday, November 15, 2010 at 17:02:04

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: What a great breed the Kerry Blue is.

Considering it is one of the rarer breeds and is classed by the Kennel Club as Vulnerable because there are so few of them, the success that this breed has had is remarkable.

In the last fifteen years the Kerry Blue has won more groups and best in shows than any other breed, which is astounding.

They all owe their success to the supreme champion handler Geoff Corish. But, more astonishing is that he never put a brush on any of them.

What a clever man he is. Surely he must be the best handler the world has ever seen?

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

(email:) on Sunday, November 14, 2010 at 17:29:33

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: I assume that the authors of all the negative comments on here are of the opinion that the Kerry winning Best of Breed is not deserving of that.

Can they point out the reasons why other Kerrys should beat it. What faults does it have?

As a novice I'm interested to know.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

Disgusted (email:) on Friday, November 05, 2010 at 19:48:48

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: This website is disgusting and I shan't be visiting again.

All that is printed here is designed to damage personal reputations. Geoff Corish is a man who is held in the highest esteem at the Kennel Club. (I don't think that you will print this on this rag bag site)

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ Why wouldn't I publish your letter? All letters that I receive are published. And as a Solicitor friend of mine once said to me; " I believe everything people tell me - why wouldn't I? " ED.]

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

(email:) on Thursday, November 04, 2010 at 22:58:55

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Quoting the best in show judge at Midland Counties:

"For BIS l had a super line-up and l thank the group judges for sending me such lovely dogs.
One dog, of course, was not able to compete was of course Chelsey the Kerry Blue, for obvious reasons.
With the points for the top dog contest being so unfair on dogs with small numbers of CCs allocated,
at this time of the year every point counts"

Keep at it Sir, you already have the Chairman of the KC in the 'back pocket' who knows what else you will be allowed to get away with? Maybe handle a dog to best of breed and then judge it yourself in the group at the same show. why not? You do as you please now and get away with it!

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

Crufts 11 (email:) on Thursday, November 04, 2010 at 19:32:09

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: The Professional handler who has just awarded best in show at Midland Counties is judging at Crufts, two breeds in fact Norfolk and Skye terriers.

Will the owner of the kerry that this handler usually shows be exhibiting himself or will it be the handlers partner?

These people do not have any conscience because at the end of this particular raibow is a massive pot of gold and they're all getting a share.

This particular Rainbow and yellow brick road started at LKA last year 2009. Mate and Mentor, travelling companions, Mentor judging mate exhibiting, two Brass Necks together with the Professional Handler giving instruction from the ringside.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


 

Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

(email:) on Thursday, November 04, 2010 at 01:07:58

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Norfolk
comments: Letter,

regarding your Pro Handler judging. How can you let the guy get away with this? It was said a few years ago that he was coming to the US to work.

He is a laughing stock over here and he could not cut it with even the mid range handlers.

He had a dog sent over from the US a couple of years back and did not band the teeth properly and its mouth went alltogether, it had to come back, its show days finished. The guy is a joke.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

Handler (email:) on Tuesday, November 02, 2010 at 18:56:15

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed

comments:
Sir, Looking at the results for your best Terrier at the Midland County Show I am mystified how you can allow a professional handler to judge best in show when the dog he usually handles is being exhibited.

Okay, it may have been pulled from competing for best in show because it did win best Terrier, but surely your Kennel Club should not allow this kind of thing to happen?

Just who is pulling the strings there? A handler would not even be judging in the US.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

(email:) on Tuesday, October 26, 2010 at 21:21:09

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue

comments: Keep entertaining the reader's .It's better than the breed notes in digs (dogs) world .

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

(email:) on Monday, October 25, 2010 at 22:55:24

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed

comments:
Lordy lordy ! Some thing's just don't change.I was thinking of showing my kerry blue terrier, However after reading peoples comments on this site I have changed my mind.

Keep up the good work slagging each other off.

BYE BYE (You people are doing the kerry breed more harm than good)

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ Maybe I have missed something here; I have looked for - but cannot find letters of - Kerry people slagging each other off. However, I do agree in principle with your letter; there are enough idiots in the breed and we don't need another one. Ed. ]

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

nil (email:nil) on Saturday, October 16, 2010 at 01:11:31

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: To terrier World,

Dear letters, regarding judges my feeling is that breed clubs should only be appointing breed specialists to judge at their shows.

Unfortunately many breed club officials use their position to futher their own judging careers.

We see time and again judges being put forward who nobody has heard of and they get through because the officials have in the meetings where they are selected loaded with their cronies who vote them through.

submit: submit

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

(email:) on Friday, October 15, 2010 at 21:07:23

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: After reading the comments that Ronnie Irving has made about about judges and the swapping of appointments it makes me furious.

I have tried to get up the judging ladder and it has been very difficult. Yet we see time and again, people who are only in a breed for a very short period being elevated very quickly.

This happens even when they have not even owned or exhibited the breed. To be quite frank it stinks!

Is it any wonder that people who are keen to judge and are overlooked soon lose heart and may even pack in altogether.

If you are not in the clique it can be many years to reach CC level.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

The obvious (email:anonymous please) on Friday, October 15, 2010 at 20:47:13

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: West Highland White
comments: Dear Letters,

after reading the article the Kennel club Chairman States Obvious article, it is now clear what we have suspected all along, judges are swapping appointments.

Also the fact the Chairman of the Kennel Club has raised this, shows just how serious a problem it has become.

We need an enquiry and those who are proven to be guilty of this should be banned from holding any position in dog clubs.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

reply (email:none) on Sunday, October 10, 2010 at 13:21:40

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Hi, in reply to the writer Judge/breed/Lakeland.

No, this man can not pick Judges. However, he has the ear of the majority of people who run the General championship Shows.

He swaps favours and judging appointments like cigarette cards, without actually owning any, if you get my drift. (I'll get you this if you can get me that for whoever)

Consequently, he has become the maker and the breaker of judging careers. Further to this, if he does you a favour getting you a judging job, when you progress and officiate at CH Show level and he shows under you you have to 'Look' after him. He always wants his favours returned.

I hope that this goes a little way towards you understanding why some Judges are selected. They are in fact being groomed for the future.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

Judge (email:) on Sunday, October 10, 2010 at 10:34:30

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Lakeland
comments: To Letters,

Dear Editor, I recently attended Darlington Dog Show as an observer not an exhibitor.

The purpose of my visit was not only to enjoy watching the Terriers but also to try and find out what the reason was for the appointment of the Lakeland Terrier Judge. Because, there are many in our breed who are desperate for classes in order to qualify for CC status.

I had never even heard of the judge let alone seen her with a Lakeland.

I enquired to an official about how this judge got the appointment for their show and he said; "She got it through Geoff." We all know who Geoff is.

Is this man picking the judges for all of the Terrier Breeds? It is little wonder that he wins big with mediocre dogs.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

(email:) on Wednesday, October 06, 2010 at 20:59:20

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Sir,

I recently attended The European Dog Show in Celje Slovenia. I noted the presence of the 'Holiday' Judges that were officiating from the United Kingdom and Eire.

Topping the list from the UK: Ronnie Irving; Frank Kane; Andrew Brace; Brenda Banbury and Albert Wight.

Representing Eire: Sean Delmar; Cathy Delmar; Seamus Oates and Michael Forte.

All UK Judges are Members of the Kennel Club along with the Chairman Ronnie Irving.

The Irish contingancy boasted their top kennel Club Officials Sean and Cathy Delmar.

Very nice work if you can get it. What is the odds you would get placing a bet on Officials from the Euro dog Show getting appointments at shows in the UK and Crufts and also St Patrick's Day Show?

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

comment (email:) on Tuesday, October 05, 2010 at 11:23:19

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Dear Editor,

Having read the comments from Natural Justice, they ask the question: "What right does the KC have to impose a fine if the people in the appeal are not KC members?" The simple answer is that they - the KC - have no right whatsoever. But, they are a law unto themselves.

The KC is a Freemason Lodge masquerading as a club. They have members and associate members.
This membership is a smokescreen. The real membership is an inner sanctum consisting of all Freemasons. You will never read in the Dog Press anything about this because they are part and parcel of the same.

We do need another alternative to exhibit our dogs. The KC has become a monster and really has little interest in the ordinary punter, they are more concerned with huge profits. Pedigree Dogs exposed proved this and the action now taken by the KC is nothing more than a shield to deflect the heat.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

(email:) on Tuesday, October 05, 2010 at 01:02:10

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Dear Letters,

The Kennel Club are doing their best for the world of dogs. These people who were fined by the Kennel club and desrve all that they have been given.

They appealed and lost. It serves them right.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


 

Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

withold (email:) on Monday, October 04, 2010 at 19:55:49

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Border
comments: Dear Terrier World,

I wondering why nobody has ever spoken up about the Chairman of the KC Ronnie Irving.

It beggars belief that this man prowls around the Border ring when they are being judged. Does this put pressure on the judge? You bet your life it does. After all, every judge would want to officiate at Crufts,
so don't cross big Ron.

submit: submit

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

Natural Justice (email:) on Monday, October 04, 2010 at 19:27:21

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Border
comments: To letters,

reading your front page article, made me both amused and angry. Amused for the obvious tongue in cheek that some of the remarks provoked and angry at the sheer arrogance of the Kennel Club.

How dare they impose fines of such idiotic amounts. The offences that these people have committed are not crimes against the state - they haven't maimed anyone, have they?

It wasn't said if they are Kennel Club members, if they are not what right does the KC have to impose a fine?

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

Intrigued (email:) on Monday, September 13, 2010 at 15:41:57

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed
comments: Dear Terrier world Letters,

I was intrigued after I read the Terrier Group Judge's Report for the Scottish Kennel Club. In his report he describes his fourth choice the Soft Coated Wheaten as having a "A Kind Eye" What is that supposed to mean?
This Judge is supposed to be a Terrier expert isn't he?

He also lavishes praise on the handler of his Group Winner, when in fact you could train a Baboon to do what this handler does, so expertly!

If the said judge reads this I would like to point out that saying a dog is "So correct for size" doesn't make it more correct. It is either 'Correct' or it is not.

Another judge playing the follow on game, just in case.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

Paul Martin (paul@davar.co.uk) on Friday, September 03, 2010 at 19:46:00

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue
comments: Dear Editor

I have just read with some amusement that someone already knows the CC winners in Kerry Blues at Crufts 2011.

As the judge for the breed I wish they would tell me as it would make my job so easy and also ensure that I don't disappoint them.

Maybe they will have the courage to say who they are and tell us all who the winners are going to be?

Paul Martin

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

withold (email:withold) on Thursday, August 26, 2010 at 22:01:55

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed

comments: To Letters,

There is widespread anger at what is going on at dog shows.
What conclusion can we come to when an owner himself a semi pro handler who trims his dog to perfection, employs a best in show judge/handler to take his dog in the ring when he himself is there?

Hopefully Miss Harrison will do a Pedigree Dogs Exposed type programme and expose the corruption within the dog show scene in the UK, it is crying out for it!

If Ms Harrison reads this I am sure she will have no shortage of contributors for her research.

I think a start would be for exhibitors to write down the list of judges in our breeds over the next 18 months and alongside the CC winners - need not be the dogs, exhibitor names will suffice, and send a copy to Ms Harrison and one to the KC, one to each of the dog press and to this website. I can name our CC winners for Crufts 2011 and for many of the the Ch shows.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


(email: anonymous please) on Tuesday, August 24, 2010 at 18:22:39

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Border

comments: To letters,

Dear Editor, I have been keeping an eye on the Kerry Blue results since I spoke with the Finnish judge
Marja Talvitie who judged them at Southern Counties.

I have known this judge for quite a while and have the utmost respect for her judging capabilities and her integrity.

She was clearly upset that a handler berated her because she did not award him best of breed at
Southern Counties.

Her decision was of course vindicated as her best of breed went on to win the group.

This bullying tactic is common practice apparently with this particular handler, when he does not get his
own way.

It would appear that foreign judge's are not easily intimidated by this handler especially the ones from
Finland.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

(email:) on Tuesday, August 24, 2010 at 17:03:27

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Kerry Blue

comments: Total agree with the comment. Lets watch this space

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

Observer (Hawkeye Mail) on Tuesday, August 24, 2010 at 13:44:27

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed

comments: Sir,

reading the letter "The Queen has got no clothes on" I made a point of watching the Terrier Group at The Welsh Kennel Club, Builth Wells.

The Judge from Finland didn't even place the recent best in show winner. I think that this reinforces what the letter writer says.

Judges in this country are afraid to 'knock' a dog once a best in show judge has awarded the top honour.
I think that the term coward is a true description of these judges who are not judging the dogs on merit and just following on from the previous Judge.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

The Queen Has Got No Clothes On! (email:) on Tuesday, August 17, 2010 at

09:35:37

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed

comments: Dear Letters,

I wonder if the cat has been let out of the bag so to speak? Is the Queen now seen in the 'Altogether?'
Looking back at recent 'Big Wins' I would say that there are some Judges who should reflect on their awards.

The practice of following on from the last Judge and their placing - for fear of being accused of not knowing a good one - is a cowards way out. There must be some very very angry Best of Breed winners in the Terrier Group.

To quote Mark Twain: "It's better to deserve honors and not have them than to have them and not desrve them." But, I would think that Mark Twain's thoughts are of no consolation to the Terrier Group Best of Breed winners!

submit: submit
Anonymous

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by

anonymous (email:withhold please) on Tuesday, July 27, 2010 at 17:54:15

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed

comments: To the editor,

Dear Sir, I have just read your page from the link "could there be an alternative" and I must say that there are some valid points that are made about an alternative organisation.
It has me wondering, why has the two main dog press providers never come up with an argument for debate about this?
I for one would certainly pay a levy toward a fund to set up another body.

submit: submit

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form.
It was submitted by Jason O'Halloran. (email:) on Monday, July 27, 2010 at 09:25:26

breed: Select Breed

Dear letters,

I was directed to this site by a friend and I must congratulate the owners of the website for actually seeing events as they are.

Terriers are not my chosen breed but I will certainly visit again.

submit: submit

Jason O'Halloran.

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form.
It was submitted by Anon (email:) on Friday, July 16, 2010 at 13:25:09

breed: Select Breed

comments: Dear editor,

I have read in the dog press about a Rough Collie breeder being reprimanded by the Sec of the Kennel Club for making derogatory remarks about two judges.

It would seem that the breeder takes great delight in making mischief on his web site and says:

" I think it is important; I think we should be able to sue a judge or the club." Mr Blake said he alone was responsible for what was written on the site.

"It s my baby," he said. "I'm in my 75th year so why shouldn't I say nasty things about people? I'm burning my bridges while I've still got all my faculties. I might as well have fun, and if it s at the KC s expense so much
the better."

I think Terrier World had better watch out!

submit: submit

[ There have already been veiled threats aimed at Terrier World. I say, if it walks like a Duck, looks like a
Duck and quacks, it is a Duck. I have a long list of people who have tried to intimidate me, past and present.
I live in Liverpool and the end of the queue for those with their threats, is currently at Southampton Ed. ]

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by on Wednesday, July 14, 2010
at 16:54:33
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
breed: Scottish

comments:

"The Russian Scottie May Be Disqualified...Who Cares! The Kennel Club is asking for proof of postage from certain Exhibitors from Crufts 2010. This is in accordance with KC Regulation F(1)9.e."

Mrs Popova would never present any proof because she has no it!!! She was telling everybody here that she is not going to Crufts this year and at last we faced her!!!

She never does any show if she doesn't shure in winning - she finds all ways to excape fron anpleasent results, but this case with Crufts was horrible!!!

And we hope that KC would make correct decition.

submit: submit

 

Go To Top Of Page


breed: N/A 13-7-10

Dear Terrier World,

Having read the recent letters I'm inclined to agree in part with both of them.

I agree that a Champions class can indeed lead the way for other dogs to be made up and as the writer says "Cheap Champions." But what other alternative is there?

Should we all just stop going to dog shows until a big winner is out of the way? What is the point in standing around in the open class knowing that the most you can hope for is a second placing? There is absolutely no point in standing in a line up, either to win a class or to compete for a CC when it is already a foregone conclusion. Your are just making up numbers and making the big winner look good.

I think that we all should get real here because this dog will be campaigned at least until Crufts 2011.

Once a dog has won big, other judges just follow suit, in the belief that if they don't put it up whispers will start that they don't know a good one.

Being pretty and standing there without animation is no justification for big wins. All of the great ones have great ring presence.

Since the docking ban all of the big winners seem to have shorter tails than all of the rest and they are like brush handles. Just a look at the others in these breeds and you will see much longer tails and also gay and curled tails. What is the secret that the breeders of these big winners hold? Practically overnight they have produced short tails that are perfectly straight into their lines. Magnificent.

submit: submit

Anonymous

Go To Top Of Page


breed: Select Breed 13-7-10

Dear Terrier World,

If we had a champions class then almost all the other dogs would eventually end up champions, that would be great for our breeds, a shed load of cheap champions, get real this isn't the states, think about it!

submit: submit

Anonymous

Go To Top Of Page


 

breed: Select Breed 12-7-10

Dear Editor,

I have just read the Judge's preamble to his report for Irish Terriers at Bath.

Mr Vickers is absolutely correct when he say we should have a Champions class.

What is the point in any exhibitor of Kerry Blues entering the open bitch class now? You may as well be throwing your money away.

We eventually got rid of a particular handler from our breed, much to the delight of the many.
But before this our entries were suffering and cliques were forming. Judges were bullied if he didn't win and this had a dramatic effect on exhibitors.

It would seem that another breed has inherited our problem and once rooted this handler is very difficult to shift.

Entering, traveling and all of the other expenses incurred in taking a dog to a show should now be saved until
the big winner has been sold for the big money that has been touted. I would even go so far as to say that if you do enter the other classes and win, don't even compete for the CC, you have no chance of winning it and res is meaningless.

Name Supplied.

Go To Top Of Page


Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Anonymous (email:) on Friday, July 09, 2010 at 09:35:03

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

breed: Select Breed

comments: Dear Terrier World

I thought that it had already been decided long ago that the 'handler' mentioned in recent correspondence could not be described as such.

He can only be described as a Professional Dog Walker. Professional Handling is a highly skilled job.
Anyone can run a dog round a ring, it's called using your connections!!!!!

submit: submit

Go To Top Of Page


breed: Any 8-7-10

comments: Dear Letters,

Reading the comments of the Lady with 'limited experience' her observations are somewhat limited also.

As I understand it, there has not been any suggestion that the dog is of inferior quality. But, the underlying tone of the questioning is why is there a need to employ a handler. The owner of this particular animal could join the Professional ranks quite easily as he is very good at what he does.

Why would you take a dog to a show, prepare it and present it as if from a jelly mold, and then, pay the most expensive handler in any breed, to trot around the ring with it? 'Ockham's Razor'

If you are familiar with 'Ockham's Razor' that is, that the simplest solution is usually the correct one, it would seem that the only reason that this particular Handler is being employed is because he has the ear of every Group and Best In Show Judge.

Signed: William of Occham.

Go To Top Of Page


breed: Kerry Blue 5-7-10

comments: Dear Terrier World,

Why does it matter who handles a dog, a Pro. or another Handler from the Breed?

Surely what matters is the quality of the dog?

I doubt a Pro. Handler would risk their reputation on a second rate dog?

Having said that Pro. Handlers don`t always win with their charges in my limited experience of the Show World.

Owners have choices surely?

Diane Ridd.

Go To Top Of Page


breed: Select Breed 5-7-10

comments: Dear Terrier World

I have also noticed this particular dog at a show being prepared for the ring by the owner whilst the 'handler' and terrier group judge sat watching him. I don't understand why he doesn't show the dog himself either.

It is supposedly because the owner has other commitments but he manages to be there to prepare the dog and after for the photos. How odd!!

Signed Confused
Anonymous

Go To Top Of Page


breed: None 1-7-10

Dear Terrier World,

I couldn't help wondering why an owner who goes to a show, prepares a dog to be exhibited at the show grooming and trimming etc., and then employs a professional handler to come along and take it into the ring.

I could understand this if the owner is a novice, in which case the handler would surely prepare the dog,
but, this is not the case in this instance.

I have seen the owner who's presentation skills are excellent and is a very good handler himself, win on numerous occasions. Why then is there a need to use this particular handler to win if the dog is good enough?

I'm sure that there are others that have noticed this.

Anonymous

Go To Top Of Page


breed: None 18-6-10

Sir,

reading your front page article, I first thought that your site is anti Kennel Club. However when I thought about it, what your article " Is it time for an alternative Kennel Club" makes a lot of sense.

Your comparison with the case of the drunk driver and someone breaking Kennel Club rules opened my eyes to the power that the KC have. It made me think, we do not have any alternative but to pay astronomical fines for petty offences, after a lengthy ban, if we wish to continue to show our dogs. This cannot be right.

Has anyone ever enquired about this to the monopolies commission?

I am in total agreement, we do need an alternative body to show our dogs.

By Email.

Go To Top Of Page


breed: None 6-6-10

Dear Letters,

There you go again, with your outdated misogyny- having a go at women for the way they look.

Come on, even things up and rip into Ronnie Irving, or some other male figures in the dog world, with equally irrelevant comments about their physical attributes or sexual proclivities
(gosh must be plenty to report on there).

You bang on about how outdated the KC is etc.. but listen to yourself: old fashioned, male, misogynist- out of the ark or what?

Seems to me you and the "Edwardian" KC probably share the same old boys network and its values. Sad.

Signed: Anonymous

[ If you want to identify yourself, I will give you a page to air your views. But, I don't think you will come out of the 'Closet'.
The difference between you and me is that I have a pair of Balls. And, I am not afraid to put my name to what I write.
Being 'Anonymous' you are to all intents and purposes an Hermaphrodite. But, whatever your gender the conclusion is the same.
A male, you have no Balls. And, a female? You also have no Balls, but probably suffer from Testicle and Penis envy Ed.]
(Some say that Ronnie Irving looks quite handsome.)

What does " Old Union " mean?

Go To Top Of Page


breed: None 4-6-10

Dear Editor,

Reading your front page article, ‘This years AGM for the Kennel Club Members proved to be a damp squib’ for me was extremely interesting. I had never given any thought to the workings of the Kennel Club.

I, like I would think thousands of others, regard the Kennel Club, well just as what its name says it is.

The article gave me food for thought.  Who is accountable from the KC to the paying public/we the breeders, exhibitors, Clubs and Societies? We don’t have any say in the running of the Kennel Club, yet they impose all kinds of costs on us because we do not have an alternative.

They even have their Kangaroo courts and fine people outrageous amounts of money for the most trivial of misdemeanours.

There is a need for an ‘Alternative Kennel Club’. A Monopoly is not a good thing no matter what it involves.

Ann Pennington.

Go To Top Of Page


breed: Border 26-5-10

Dear Letters,

Hi, 'Came across your site and 'like it very much.

I have to say though that I was put off to read the comments about Claire 'Butch' Balding and Caroline Kisko looking like a waxwork from Mme Tussauds.

I think everything else in the articles is spot on and commendable, but (and it's your website, you can write what you like of course), is it necessary to write about people like that. I'm sure Claire Balding is a decent human being and I think it's cheap and nasty to write about someone you may not know, like that.

Up to you - I like everything else but that's not necessary in an otherwise well written piece.

Jay Horgan (Staffs)

[ I am glad that you like the Magazine and there are ' Donate ' buttons in various places on the site.
This particular ' Muckraker ' provides all of the news, show results and Judge's Critiques etc. - which takes a considerable amount of time - for free, including Stud And Litter Adverts.

Ms Balding may well be all that you say she is; I don't know her. However, your sensitivity to my observations of her - if you don't know her either - are a little puzzling to me.

Millionaire Claire comes across as ignorant and arrogant with her crass remarks when fronting TV Programs.
Your defence of Ms Balding is admirable, but I'm sure the Presenter is thick enough skinned along with her formidable [ Desperate Dan ] jaw line, to take it on the chin. After all, her crass remarks, are seen and heard by millions.

Regarding Caroline Kisko - the apologist and cohort of Ronnie Irving, the KC Chairman - the wax really is a remarkable likeness, don't you think? Ed.]

Go To Top Of Page


breed: None Given 12-4-10

Dear Letters,

comments: I'm really astonished and sorry that whoever writes/edits your news sees fit to join the ranks of gutter journalism in conflating Clare Balding's views on GSD's with vile comments about the way she looks/her sexuality.

To disagree with Clare Balding's views on matters she perhaps does not understand is fine, but to take such cheap shots does you and your online journal a great disservice.

Grow up or go write for the News of the World.

Signed: Anonymous

[Presumably the writer of the above thinks that it's okay to humiliate a Grand National winning Jockey - with an audience of millions watching on television. Clare Balding interviewed Liam Treadwell after his magnificent win at Aintree and made an outrageous comment about his crooked teeth. That's okay then is it? Ed.] .

(Identify yourself and your question may be answered)

Go To Top Of Page


breed: Kerry Blue 7-3-10

comments: Dog World Bedlam Kerry Blue Breed Notes

Dear letters,

I read with amusement D/W Kerry Blue Breed Notes 5-3-10. The writer of these notes gets more incredulous by the week.

She wrote:

"I RECALL writing several months ago about dog and people photographs in advertisements and found it interesting to come across yet another DOG WORLD with similar observations by Andrew Brace who said: “We have now become accustomed to the modern ‘win pic’ favoured by most exhibitors in their advertising, where the dog’s handler seems to be as important as the dog itself.
Of course everyone to their own, but isn’t the dog the important subject? It is nice to see ‘everyday’ pictures of dogs with their owners and some relaxed pictures, but I personally still much prefer to see the dog as the prominent and important feature in show stance." (Yeah, just like the one from Crufts with Mrs Munro)

Follow the links:

http://www.highampress.co.uk/blackpool/terrier.asp?show=Blackpool 2009&ttl=Blackpool 2009 - Terrier Group
http://www.flickr.com/photos/thekennelclub/3332136895/in/set-72157614793314667/

Now anyone who isn't a half wit wouldn't write the above if they had posed for the photos in the links. As I understand it, you are not forced to be in any win photograph with a dog.

I don't wish to repeat what has already been published, but I really do think that it is necessary. Do you think that the Breed Correspondent is aping the Prime Minister? For Gordon Brown is detached from reality too.

Could it be sour grapes?

Signed Picture Perfect2
Anonymous

Go To Top Of Page


breed: N/A 22-12-09

comments: Who am I?

The Cynics will always surface when there is an introduction of new ideas.  We must look forward from the BBC program and get real.  Let’s face it there are some very serious issues with many breeds that need to be addressed.

There is another issue that needs to be looked at.  Identity.

DNA Profiling is the only way forward for dog identity. Micro chipping can be removed, ears that have been tattooed  can be removed, DNA remains.  Furthermore, DNA profiling is the only sure way to ensure that dogs carrying serious faults even though they may be big winners are identified if used at stud or for litters.

As was exposed in the BBC program; unscrupulous breeders do not care a jot as long as they get CH in front of the dog’s name.

By Email

Go To Top Of Page


breed: N/A 22-12-09

comments:

Dear letters,

I agree with the writer who says that the Accredited Breeders Scheme is “the thin end of the wedge”

I remember many years ago when the Suttons were trying to have the entry fees for shows increased dramatically.

This would have out priced the Hobbyist from dog showing and then left the spoils to the ‘Elite’.

We should be very wary of this Breeders scheme and all that will follow on from it.

By Email

Go To Top Of Page


breed: None 22-12-09

comments: What It Says On The Tin.

Dear Editor,

I would like to add my view for what it’s worth regarding the accredited Breeders Scheme. In essence I think that it is a good idea, but, the Kennel Club and its so called concern for the welfare of dogs is a thin veneer.

The kennel Club is money driven, always has been and always will be. It is a very exclusive club run by a Hierarchy of Freemasons.

The program Pedigree Dogs Exposed did indeed expose the Kennel Club for what it is; a money spinning monopoly with a tight grip on the world of pedigree dogs. Until there is real transparency from the Kennel Club we should regard anything that the Kennel Club proposes that costs more money as exactly what it says on the tin; We Want More Money From You.

By Email

Go To Top Of Page


breed: N/A 21-12-09

comments: Loadsa Money

Sir,

I find the article published (Terrier World News 21st December 09) by Ronnie Irving on the RSPCA’s response to the Apgaw report incredulous. Is this the same Ronnie Irving who reacted so arrogantly when being interviewed in the BBC program ‘Pedigree Dogs Exposed’ ?

I also find it fascinating that Irving bleats on about the ‘Accredited Breeders Scheme’.
We all know that this was another money spinner for the Kennel Club even before the BBC program.

The program and all of the furore that followed it has added weight to this money spinner.
And what next? The Accredited Breeders Scheme is the thin end of the wedge.

Bank on me; what will follow will be that you won’t be able to register dogs unless you are an
Accredited Breeder and it is a knocking bet that the cost of becoming an Accredited Breeder will then soar.

Fall into the Accredited Breeders trap if you will; you have been warned.
It is another money making racket for the Kennel Club. Don’t Join It!

By Email

Go To Top Of Page


breed: Kerry Blue 4-11-09

comments: How would we know?

Dear Terrier World,

I cannot understand what all of this fuss is about regarding the Kerry Blue breed Notes in Dog World.

How on earth would we readers know what is in the many articles printed in Dog World if Mrs Munro didn't include them in her notes? It is common knowledge that everyone who buys Dog World at a cost of £2.20 does so just to read the Kerry Breed Notes.

So all of you, yes, all of you, get off Mrs Munro's back and support her. She is providing a specialist service to the whole of the country who cannot understand articles unless they are in the Kerry Notes.

Signed: Eternally Grateful
Anonymous


breed: Kerry Blue 23-10-09

comments: To Err is human, to Forgive Divine.

Dear Terrier World,

I waited in vain for mistakes to be rectified 16/10/09 D/W Kerry Blue breed notes. No such luck.
It would seem that "AT BELFAST Jack Watson was judging the breed with CCs for the first time. From an entry of 11 consisting of five males and six females with one of each sex absent he awarded DCC, his first, and BOB to Cussack, O’Brien and Poulova’s Ir Ch Edbrios Marco Polo who was bred by O’Brien and Poulova."
This first CC must be presumably added to the 'First' CC he won under Tony Manning at the same show in 2008.

And yet again in D/W notes this week we have a three years old BP winner announced at Driffield "BP was Paula Ward’s homebred Rimbert Phantom Menace DOB 2/12/06 (Tunde Bayou ex Ch Torum’s Dixie Lee). I think this was the first championship show for this puppy though his sisters have acquitted themselves very well with Queen Padme being a consistent puppy winner and R Queen Of Naboo at Lemracdream taking BP at Darlington" ( If his sisters are doing well, maybe he sired himself)

There is always self promotion bubbling away in the Kerry Notes and unfortunately there is nothing that we can do about this. But, surely, the very least that we should expect from the writer is correct information.
What do we get instead? Continual inaccuracies some corrected others never - depending on whom the breeder/handler/owner is.
We also get line upon line of replicated articles belonging other writers.

Is there linage being paid by D/W? I wonder.

Signed: Wishful Thinking.
Anonymous


breed: N/A 13-10-09

comments:

Dear Terrierworld,

I am writing to voice my disgust with the Kennel Club and the remarks attributed to the Chairman
Ronnie Irving that Mr Irving had suggested GSD breed clubs should get their house in order or they would be thrown out of the KC.

Once again Mr Irving's apologist ( Mrs Kisko ) has been wheeled out to try and diffuse the situation brought about by the arrogant Chairman alleged remarks. We all saw in the TV Documentary Pedigree Dogs Exposed
just how short the Chairman's fuse is when under pressure and it is overwhelmingly obvious that he bristles with arrogance. The Chairman should have done the honorable thing and resigned after the BBC program.
However, power is infectious and once it has bitten it is never readily relinquished.

I suggest that since Crufts is now back on TV 2010, shouldn't the Chairman take the lead and judge all of the breeds that are contentious? Yes, let him, Irving start the ball rolling in full view of the watching world on TV; let him be the one to cast the first stone! But what does he preside over instead? Sending out letters to all judges to do the so called dirty work for him and his cohorts at Clarges Street. ( All Judges will have received this letter in the last two weeks)

In my view the sooner we are shot of Ronnie Irving the better.

Signed: Paws For Thought

Email Address Supplied

Go To Top Of Page


breed: Kerry Blue 19-9-09

comments: Why?

Dear Letters,

I read the letter by Picture Perfect Dated 7/08/09 and followed the link to the Fickr site.
The picture it takes you to, is of Mrs P Munro with the Kerry Blue Best Of Breed winner Crufts 2009.
Nothing wrong with that. But, to then write about people wanting to get in on the act so to speak when pictures of their Kerries are taken, screams of; ' Don't do as I do, do as I say. ' How else can anyone conclude it to be otherwise?
Just a thought; If I had such strong views as it appears Mrs Munro has about being Photographed when she wrote in Dog World 7th August:

" Does our present day society have the all about me attitude as it does seem to me that long gone are the days of dogs being the important feature in pictures ."

I would have refused to be in the picture if I didn't want to be in it. The composition is down to the photographer, and it's not set in stone. Did she think that the KC would disqualify the dog if she didn't grace the picture?

Why then did she not ask the owners to pose for the pictures with the dog? Or, just say to the Kennel Club Photographer 'No thank you, I don't want to be in the picture' There are four BOB Terrier winners of 2009 on Flickr without handlers in the pictures.
And when has it been a requirement for your photograph to be taken if you win BOB? It may be a request but it isn't an obligation.

It seems to me that when those remarks were written by Mrs Munro she was clearly targeting someone and her remarks have come back to bite her on the bum.

The rules for snide remarks are: Never make one if you are guilty of the same thing.
The rules for holes are: When in one, stop digging.

For example: Taken From Dog World Kerry Breed Notes 28th August:

" Carrying on from the column of Aug 8, those who know me are fully aware how I dislike having my photo taken. By all accounts I am now being accused of being hypocritical as comparison is being made to the KC’s website showing pictures of Crufts winners and the Aug 8 column. It was a requirement at Crufts that BOB winners were photographed with the dogs in a non-show position with the owner/handler – and who am I to rock the boat? It doesn’t mean I have to like the idea. I was certainly unaware at the time exactly why these were required and who, in fact, was taking photos as there were so many. "

Why carry on digging when you are in a hole, you only make it deeper!

Gone are the days when the only access to information was if you kept every darn snippet of information just in case you may need it for reference. God Bless The Internet and God Bless Terrier World, for without them there would be just one voice singing it's own praises, as it was in the past.

Signed: The Dark Room For Developers.
Anonymous

Go To Top Of Page


breed: Wire Haired Tasmanian Devil 22-8-09

comments: KC Chairman's Annual Address To The Welsh Kennel Club's Dinner Congregation.

Sir,

After reading the report of Chairman Irving's Speech to the congregation at the WKC's Annual Dinner, I found myself laughing at some of the content and furious at other parts of it.

Chairman Irving suggests that we the societys who stage dog shows in all cases should;
" should remember that they should be entertaining and educational and not aimed at self-glorification."

Wow! Isn't this rich coming from the Kennel Club that has a 'Guaranteed Income' from every Society for licenses and all of the rest of it and the income from the registering of litters and all that goes with this too? Moreover, who are the biggest self back slappers and glory hunters in the business? Yes of course it is the Kennel Club!

Isn't it also rich that Chairman Irving uses the Welsh Annual Dinner to voice his prepared speeches and to lecture us in his smug way. Yet, when he should have stood up and been counted after the ' Pedigree Dogs Exposed ' program, he went to ground, leaving the hapless Caroline Kisko and Bill Lambert to deal with the media.

In the program, the KC Chairman who has been breeding Borders for 42 years now, was asked by the interviewer for Pedigree Dogs Exposed what he thought of inbreeding. He denied breeding father/daughter or brother/sister but he DID confirm he had bred grandfather/granddaughter.

Further into the program, he also dismissed a scientific report about the problems of inbreeding as being "unscientific & emotive" then, later in the program when he was flustered, said "no scientist is going to tell me how to breed dogs when I've been doing it for 40 years." etc etc

Was this final part of his speech to the Welsh Dinner Assembly trying to justify the above statement and the absolute 'Dogs Dinner' he made of himself in the program Pedigree Dogs Exposed;

He said, “Yes, we believe that science and rules are an important part of the solution but we believe also that breeders – especially responsible and experienced breeders – should be helped by the science and the rules but should not be controlled by them."

We should not forget that the Program Pedigree dogs Exposed was two years in the making and Chairman Irving's inept Leadership was exposed when asked perfectly legitimate questions.

The Kennel Club was in a state of panic after the TV Program and was for some time thereafter being dragged along by events rather than controlling and dictating them.

Anonymous

Go To Top Of Page


breed: Kerry Blue 7-8-09

comments: Just read DW breed notes 7th Aug, Couldnt agree more with MS Munro.

Perhaps she has inadvertantly started the trend with photo that can be seen at this location

http://www.flickr.com/photos/thekennelclub/3332136895/in/set-72157614793314667/


Ms Munro Writes "On many occasions I have seen photos of owners with dogs who are holding a dog in their arms or sitting the dog front on with the owner posed beside obviously in order to be included.
I cannot see how a dog can be seen from show photos as a show dog if it is sitting down or being held in someones arms. Does our present day society have the all about me attitude as it does seem to me that long gone are the days of dogs being the important feature in pictures".

Signed Picture Perfect
Anonymous

(EDITOR: In The Boxing Ring They Say Don't Lead With Your Chin Or You May End Up With A Cauliflower Arse.
But, It May An Age Thing; Going Through The MemoryPause Perhaps?)

Go To Top Of Page


breed: Airedale 7-8-09
comments:

Regarding the comments from Alex on Professional Handlers I need to offer a comment.

The Sealyham that won Crufts was a winner on merit in Europe, America and Crufts. How much I would love to see the handler and dog in Australia. A joy to be in a line up together and no shame to lose.

One of the things that make dog shows exciting is speculation. Of course this was the talk of Birmingham.

A stunning exhibit of the highest class.

Keith Lovell
Australia

Go To Top Of Page


breed: None 9-7-09
comments:

I read the news page of Terrier World dated July 9th 2009 and to be quite honest I was absolutely amazed at the new breed that may be on display at Crufts 2010.

Is there an address that I can contact with a view to purchasing a pup?

What Group will it be in?

Keep up the good work all you at Terrier World, I enjoy the site.

Ben Turpin

Go To Top Of Page


breed: None 27-5-09
comments:

Dear Terrier world,

It would seem that the advice Mrs Munro has been advocating in the Kerry Breed Notes/ Dog World about non exhibitors being allowed to breed has at last struck home.

The Queen is finally giving up breeding her Corgis. Her Majesty should have stopped years ago, she has never shown any of them to my knowledge, but then I could be wrong.

It would seem that HRH has had enough holidays and new cars. It will give the Show Exhibitors a chance now.

Anonymous

Go To Top Of Page


breed: None 7-5-09
comments:

Dear Terrier world,

Fair comment what Alex Brittain wrote, but anyone with an eye for a dog can see that the Sealyham is stunning.

Anonymous

Go To Top Of Page


breed: Norfolk 1-5-09
comments:

Dear Terrier world,

I showed one of my dogs at Crufts,2009. Within an hour of the start of day 1 of Crufts the hall was buzzing with talk that it would be the Sealyham that would win B.I.S this year...and, guess what??

I wrote to the Kennel Club suggesting that they should introduce a system of showing dogs where they were shown by K.C.handlers who drew the number of the dog from a hat! Needless to say, they didn't reply.

The whole world of dog showing is run on the "Judges Favour" system. Totally corrupt.

Alex Brittain
(Email provided)

Go To Top Of Page


breed: Kerry Blue 29-3-09
comments:

Dear Terrier World,

I have just read the breed notes for the kerrys 25/3/09 and for me it sums up the writer for dog world. This woman has been using her space in the dog world breed notes for years to further her own ends.

Full marks to this new area that we now have to air our views and highlight the awful things that are going on in kerrys.

Thank you.

(Name and Email provided)

Go To Top Of Page


Crufts Best In Show Judge 2013

breed: na 28-2-09
comments:

Dear Terrier World,

Just checked on the KCs website. Geoff Corish did judge Westies at Crufts 2000 when Mike Coad won best in show.

Gumshoe

Go To Top Of Page


Crufts Best In Show Judge 2013

breed: Kerry 27-2-09
comments:

Dear Terrier World,

If as the writer A Another sugests, that co-habiting partners one judging and the other handling at the same show and on the same day is correct, then something is seriously wrong in the UK.

Surely the British Kennel Club Board can not condone this; or does it?

True Blue US

Go To Top Of Page


Crufts Best In Show Judge 2013

breed: Any 27-2-09
comments:

Dear Terrier World,

Blackdog raises some interesting points about handling and is obviously a keen observer, and factually correct.

But, the most interesting point to me is in his paragraph, "Regarding Best In Show At Crufts". He puts forward a strong case when he imply's that you do not require any skills to judge best in show, stating quite correctly that the supposedly best from the six groups have been chosen for you.

We have all seen and heard the BBC presenters drooling and uttering superlatives about each and every one of the six finalists for best in show and each adding little snippets of gossip and tips about a so called favorite to win. What happens when the winner is picked? Nothing except ooh's and ah and it was the ........whatever. A big yawn everyone. Blackdog is right it doesn't matter which one it is.

As a Handler I will judge if invited because there isn't any rule to say that I can't. But because I do doesn't mean that it's right. Considering that this discussion is all about "A question of ethics for the Kennel Club"
there are certain facts that have disturbed me for quite a while. At Crufts Millennium Show 2000 the best in show winner was handled professionally. At this very same show his co-habiting gay partner himself a professional handler, judged Westies.
The fact that the eventual best in show winner handled by the Westie judges partner, went into the group and then challenged for best in show should never have been allowed.

Blackdog finishes his paragraph stating that if a dog snaps at a judge it should be dismissed, no matter how good it is. I agree. Yet, at the very same show Crufts 2000 the best in show winner tried to bite the judge's hand. Should it have been dismissed, If not why not? The only answer to this is privy to the two professionals and the best in show judge. As Blackdog said about the Cosa Nostra," Are you connected?"

A Another.

Go To Top Of Page



Crufts Best In Show Judge 2013

breed: None 24-2-09
comments:

Dear Terrier World,

Confused is a fitting title from the writer of "Re: Crufts BIS 2013"

Let me explain so 'Confused' will no longer be confused. Eh? I will call you "Hermaphrodite" so that everybody isn't confused.

Whenever someone is prepared to pay you for your skills, you are regarded as a 'Professional'.

So Hermaphrodite, the title "Professional Handler" is a little ambiguous. That is why I say that Geoff Corish is a
"Professional Dog Walker".

What is the difference?

A PROFESSIONAL HANDLER:
A Handler will have a team of dogs, and you will see he/she constantly attending to them, before and in between judging, daffying them up, pulling bits of coat out, tipping with scissors; even washing the dogs. Grooming is constant, ensuring that the final picture presented to the Judge for assessment is pristine. This also takes place before shows at the handlers kennels with constant attention being given and precise timing needed for pulling coat to ensure the best possible presentation on show day. The likes of Bob Barlow, Ernest Sharpe, Billy Mitchell, Les Atkinson, Frankie Kellett, Herbert Atkinson and Fred Sills. They were Professional Handlers, all deceased except Ernest who I think has all but retired. I won't mention others as you can see them at any show doing what they do. This is the Professional Handler's routine.

A PROFESSIONAL DOG WALKER:
A Dog Walker is a completely dIfferent. What you get is exactly what's on the tin! They don't prepare the dogs, they don't groom the dogs, in fact you could teach a Chimpanzee to do what they do. They take the dogs from the owners, who have done all of the work themselves and walk it around the ring. But, what they have got that Chimpanzees don't have, is connections. Like the Mafia would say; "Are you connected?"

REGARDING BEST IN SHOW AT CRUFTS: Give me one single day to coach anyone who has never even been to a dog show and they could judge Best In Show at Crufts, or any other major Championship show! Six dogs, do me a favor! When all the work that the Breed Judges and Group Judges sorting out the best ones has been done for them you could do it blindfold. Pick any one of the six dogs and nobody would bat an eyelid. It doesn't matter which one wins, it is the phoniest finale that you will ever come across. If you win a group and have to return on another day for Best In Show, it is a non event. And, nine times out of ten the outcome is already decided, it is purely cosmetic. Crufts is no different.
There are occasions when a Best In Show Judge should dismiss a dog for an award. For example, if the dog happens to go lame, or if it is spooked and will not show, or if the dog snaps at the Judge. No matter how good the dog is, these things can not be ignored.

So Hermaphrodite, I hope things are a little more clear for you.

Blackdog

Go To Top Of Page


Crufts Best In Show Judge 2013

breed: Terrier 24-2-09
comments:

Dear Terrier World,

Re: Crufts BIS 2013. Reading the comments from "Blackdog" 17-2-09 I am a little confused. Why does he/she say that Geoff Corish is not a professional handler, but a professional dog walker? All of the dogs that you will see him with are turned out immaculately and are a credit to his skills as a professional handler.

In my mind, this is why he will be judging best in show at Crufts.

Confused.

Go To Top Of Page


Dark Side Of The Puppy Trade Exposed By New BBC Documentary

breed: Many 19-2-09
comments:
Champions From Eleven Different Breeds

Dear Terrier World,

I have just watched the BBC Rogue Traders about a pet shop and a puppy farm selling puppies to the public that are ill.

The RSPCA was called in [ to inspect the puppy farm ] but declined to visit that day. They did inspect the Kennels the next day and found nothing wrong.

That gave the owner twenty four hours to tidy up.

The puppies purchased died within a day or two from parvovirus.
That means that it [ parvo ] was on the premises as it takes six months to sterilise a kennel after the disease.

What sort of job are the RSPCA doing !!!

My kennels are inspected twice a year by the council and you know when the inspectors arrive that they haven’t got a clue how a kennel should be run and it's probably the same with the RSPCA.

I pride myself in the kennels and have been breeding for over forty years and anyone can visit without prior arrangement to see they are clean, with the animals well fed, watered, exercised and happy.

To run a large kennel is expensive and can cost over a thousand pound per week to run, wages, heating, food, veterinary costs etc.
So when you sell puppies it is not all profit in fact add your time and it is a labour of love.

Then at the end of the program came the crunch !!! Why buy a pedigree dog when there are thousands wanting homes?

Well a pedigree dog from a breeder/show kennel has had years of expertise into the breed that they have for sale.
Most show kennels of repute breed litters with the intention of keeping a puppy from the litter for themselves to show and further the breeding program.
So from this litter say from a Great Dane to a Chihuahua you are getting the best bloodlines that money can buy.

If you wanted a Derby winner in horses you would not go to the knackers yard.

Pedigree versus crossbred/mongrel: Crossbreds are two breeds eg: German Shepherd/Dobermann.
A mongrel is mixed, maybe the litter had one or two sires and the dam was also of mixed race.

You can go to the RSPCA kennels and dogs homes and you will see very few pedigree dogs but hundreds of mongrels. Why ?

The reason is nobody wants them because a lot of the time they are in there for a reason, nasty, dirty, chewers, over sexed.

If you own a mongrel and it is a nice dog, good with the children, clean, well mannered and you lost him or her you would go out of your way to get him/her back. But if it's nasty, dirty etc you would be glad to see the back of it.

Then there are the puppies thrown out by callous people and end up in these homes.

You take the family to pick a puppy a lovely bundle of fluff and then it may grow up too big and be the nasty, dirty dog and ends up back where it came from.
With a pedigree dog from a respective breeder you at least know what you are getting.

To all my fellow breeders, never breed from a nasty dog, try your best to insure the puppy has no hereditary diseases.

We can only do our best and there are very many good breeders who’s heart and soul are in their dogs.
Stand United !

Judith Averis (Saredon Kennels)

Go To Top Of Page


Crufts Best In Show Judge 2013

breed: Kerry 17-2-09
comments:

Dear Terrier World,

It will be very difficult to have a Pro Handler who may have handled dogs belonging to people who will be showing at Crufts.

Deccy

Go To Top Of Page


Crufts Best In Show Judge 2013

breed: none 17-2-09
comments:

Dear Terrier World,

Rumour or solid facts? This has been going around for quite a bit now and the serious money is on
Geoff Corish; who else could it be?

'Cat got the cream? He should have kept his trap shut!

Word has it that he has been penciled in for best in show at Crufts in the near future. If you look at it logically, he is the only so called Pro Handler who has judged best in show at the big shows.

Not bad for a Professional Dog Walker. No, he is not a Pro Handler, he's a dog walker and a very very expensive one too.

Oh my dog, wee should all Bow Wow Wow down to him!

Blackdog.

Go To Top Of Page


Crufts Best In Show Judge 2013

breed: none 16-2-09
comments:

Dear Terrier World,

Some interesting thoughts by your readers.

But, the question that has not been asked as of yet is, "Who is the professional handler?" Any one know who it is?

Justa Wondering

Go To Top Of Page


Crufts Best In Show Judge 2013

breed: Any 13-2-09
comments:

Dear Terrier World,

As a "Professional" Handler myself I can understand the concern about handlers judging. Should handlers be allowed to judge? There is only one answer, No. Do I judge? Yes. I will accept appointments if invited, because there isn't a rule to say that I can't.

Is it "Ethical" to do both? A resounding No! When I am invited to judge a particular breed, there is usually refreshments provided before or after depending on what time you judge. In the restaurants there are other judges having lunch. The conversations are always to do with dogs. Can you plant seeds with them? Of course you can! And can this lead to a bias when you show under them, Yes it can and does happen. This is why it is unethical to be able to do both.

A Another.

Go To Top Of Page


Crufts Best In Show Judge 2013

breed: Kuvasz 8-2-09
comments:

Dear Terrier World,

In the US we have many professional handlers who do a great job. They are on the road sometimes for many weeks at a time, with some employing many junior handlers.

I can't understand why the English KC allows pro handlers to judge. It doesn't happen in the US and quite rightly so.

What is going on over there?

Erling Klausen USA

Go To Top Of Page


Crufts Best In Show Judge 2013

breed: Westie 8-2-09
comments:

Dear Terrier World,

Keith Lovell's view sums it all up. You choose one or the other, as a 'Professional Handler' or as an ordinary Exhibitor who chooses to become involved in judging.
This is usually started by judging match meetings, Limit Shows and then Open Shows. They are then given other breeds as their expertise developes and thus they then gain a lot of knowledge and experience.

Professional Handlers should be prohibited from Judging by the KC until they finish their profession.
The sooner the Kennel Club gets to grips with this the better. Further; just because a judge is a Professional Handler, doesn't necesseraly make them a good Judge! I have seen some very strange awards given by the so called Professionals.

Spot The Westie.

Go To Top Of Page


Crufts Best In Show Judge 2013

breed: Airedale 7-2-09
comments:

Dear Terrier World,

Professional handlers often have an amazing knowledge of a number of breeds. They make a significant contribution to the quality of presentation and handling in our show rings. It is arguable that they are of overall benefit to the fraternity as their winning regularly exceeds that that the same dog would achieve if owner handled. They can have the effect of lesser dogs being sought for stud work and frustrated owner handlers drifting away from shows.
(However,I acknowledge that they also can bring out the best in a great dog that may never have made the ring without professional help.)

As for judging! Why? They have made their choice. They choose to be paid by the people who can afford them and there is no doubt they give value for money. Who however wants professionalism to influence judging decisions? Who wants to be judged by somebody who may never have read the breed standard? Why be judged by somebody bound not by the judges rules and ethics but with their own set of handlers rules and ethics. Such a prestigious appointment would see their stakes rise as a professional handler and certainly be good for their business.

Judges work hard to develop their skills, learn standards and gain experience. Let them do their job or lose them just like we have lost many potential future breeders and exhibiters who just could never get a foot in the door because of the amazing skills of the professional.

In many Countries' rules a judge is not permitted to handle for other people. In the USA a handler (or Kennel Club employee) is not permitted to judge in the USA.

Crufts, above all other shows in the UK, should send the right message. Surely with their amazing recources and The Kennel Clubs influence world wide they could find a qualified judge who has the ability, presentation and probably never judged a best in show before. Indeed I bet they have.

This is more than likely an ugly rumour and does not even deserve this response.

Keith Lovell

Airedale and Welsh Terriers Downunder.

Go To Top Of Page


BBC DOCUMENTARY PEDIGREE DOGS EXPOSED
‘The Kennel Club Answers Back’

23-09-08

Dear Terrier World,

Re the Kennel Club documentary.

All breeders are not unconcerned with the health issues on their breeds but the program seemed to tar us all with the same brush.

I have been breeding for over 40 years and if there are health issues in my breeds I have all the necessary tests done on my dogs.

Airedales are x-rayed for hip dysplasia and if any one of mine had a high score it would never be bred from.

You can however, have a stud dog and a brood bitch with good scores and still get [hip] dysplasia but this is rare and by having the dogs x-rayed we have done our best.

Micro-chipping and DNA is a good thing in breeds as it leaves no doubt that breeders have switched pedigrees.

My suggestion to The Kennel Club is to have a two tier registration scheme as the Cat Clubs do.

You register all your puppies with the Kennel Club. If you wish to use a dog at Stud or Breed from a bitch you need to get any health checks done relating to that breed and if they pass they go onto an active register.

If they fail the tests they stay where they are and any progeny cannot be registered.

I am not on the accredited Breeders Scheme as I feel this is for any one and if I had a dog with a genetic disorder I could still breed from her or use him at stud.

All you require is DNA and micro-chipping to go on the scheme.

I have people coming to use my dogs at Stud and it maybe their first ever litter and they bring me the purple accredited breeders form to sign and [they] haven't a clue about dogs.

'Accredited' should stand for something as it does in Horse, Sheep, cattle and pigs. You cannot register these animals without first testing them.

JUDITH AVERIS SAREDON KENNELS

Go To Top Of Page


19-09-08

Dear Terrier World,

Oh what a can of worms the BBC Documentary has opened. We now have two of the big names in animal charities disassociating themselves with the Kennel Club and its Premier Dog Show Crufts. The comments from the spokes persons for the Kennel Club have been disastrous.
What is needed is strong leadership and a root and branch inquiry, not just on the health problems, but into the whole
of the dog showing world.
There needs to be a DNA profile of every dog that is registered with the KC. This would ensure that the bloodlines on pedigrees are correct.
Cosmetic enhancement of any animal should be stamped on with lifetime bans.
Professional Handlers should be barred from Judging; they either handle, or judge, as it is in America.
People in high positions within dog clubs should refrain from showing dogs; namely the Chairman Of The Kennel Club - one or the other.
If you want to exhibit dogs stay away from high office.
What is needed from the Kennel Club is total Transparency.
Do the Kennel Club publish its accounts? How much money
have they actually got and what is the value of their assets?
Shouldn't the Kennel Club be putting some of their millions
of pounds back into dogs and exhibitors; if not why not? Why do they need all of the millions of pounds that they have accrued from exhibitors?

(Confidentiality Requested)

Go To Top Of Page


28-08-08

Dear Terrier World,

I don't think the programme was one-sided at all - it just presented the facts objectively & scientificaly & exposed what has been going on. It confirmed many of my fears over the way some pedigree breeds look now & explained why.

As to the KC Chairman/Spokesperson who has been breeding Borders for 40 years - he denied breeding father/daughter or brother/sister but he DID confirm he had bred grandfather/grandaughter.

He also dismissed a scientific report about the problems of inbreeding as being unscientific & emotive then, later in the programme when he was flustered, said "no scientist was going to tell him" how to breed dogs when he'd been doing it for 40 years, etc etc

I was extremely saddened by the ataxic German Shepherds staggering around on their weak back legs & the Cavalier King Charles spaniel whining in agony with syringomyalia.

I would like to see more awareness of proper genetics in dog breeding & more objective input from science rather than irresponsible people indiscriminatingly breeding dogs for money & status.

Please note I'm NOT implying that ALL breeders are like this but there seems to be mounting evidence that there are a good few out there.

(Confidentiality Requested)

Go To Top Of Page


BBC DOCUMENTARY PEDIGREE DOGS EXPOSED
‘The Kennel Club Answers Back’

25-09-08

Dear Terrier World,

I would agree with Judith Averis's letter; we have all been tarred with the same brush.

The kennel Club's response to all of this has been woefully inadequate. (Is it any wonder the debate on docking was lost?)

Where is the Chairman Ronnie irving, has he gone to ground? Is he so inarticulate that he is in hiding?

Quite frankly, Kisco and Lambert are also out of their depth when even rudimentary questions are put to them. They lack the gravitas of a strong Chairman who knows his facts and is prepared for probing questions. In any organization the ultimate responsibility belongs to the Chairman; the buck stops there. If he's not up to the job he should go. His position [The Chairman] is becoming increasingly untenable.

The writer who suggested an alternative Kennel Club is talking a lot of sense. But, unfortunately, this would take a massive amount of courage from those who are prepared to break away. The existing Kennel Club would ban them and not allow registration of their dogs.

(Confidentiality Requested)


21-09-08

Dear Terrier World,

There are rumors that the Pekingese clubs feel so threatened by the Kennel Club's attitude in targeting their breed, they may break away and form their own Kennel Club. Would this be a bad thing?

The Kennel Club as we know it has had a total Monopoly on dogs for far to long.

What the World Of Dogs needs is an alternative Kennel Club. This would ensure that there would be another direction to go and it would encourage healthy competition; not just the do as we say attitude of the Kennel Club.

(Confidentiality Requested)

Go To Top Of Page


29-08-08

Dear Terrier World,

I have watched the BBC Documentary ‘Pedigree Dogs Exposed’ and the ‘Kennel Club Answers Back’ a number of times now and it leads me to believe that the Kennel Club Hierarchy is woefully inept.

In the BBC Documentary perfectly valid points were raised by the program makers about disturbing health issues in various breeds. Inbreeding also seemed to be a very contentious issue, yet, when the Chairman of the Kennel Club was asked probing question on this matter, it appeared that he was in deep waters unable to swim.

The program ‘The Kennel Club Answers Back’ also amazed me. The spokesperson for the Kennel Club, Caroline Kisko, was asked about the health problems in certain breeds. Her answer was unbelievably astonishing. She stated that some health problems had been inherited by the KC in some breeds, from Victorian times. Yes, Victorian times! It is 2008 for goodness sakes!

Do we as breeders need a change of leadership? Of course we do. But, the problem that we have as breeders and exhibitors is that we have absolutely no say in the matter. Why? Because the Kennel Club is exactly what it says, it is a Club, a very Exclusive Club. The obvious question is why do we not join the club and bring about change? It can’t be that simple can it? No. Unfortunately you can only ever be an Associate Member of the Kennel Club.

Associate membership was introduced by the Kennel Club not to increase its membership, but to increase its revenue. The uninformed people who are associate members live in hope of becoming full members at some period. This will never happen to the majority of the associates, because to become a full member you have to be a Freemason, proposed by other Freemasons for entry. The Kennel Club is a very exclusive Club because it is a Freemason Lodge.

(Confidentiality Requested)

Go To Top Of Page


22-08-08

Dear Terrier World,

Sir,
To say that I was shocked at what I saw in the BBC documentary ‘Pedigree Dogs Exposed’ on Tuesday night would be an understatement.

Watching the suffering of the King Charles Spaniel and that poor Boxer dog that were filmed in the program was most distressing.

It makes one wonder just how much interest the Kennel Club takes in those particular breeds that have clearly had serious problems for a long time.

Does the Kennel Club just regard these breeds as nothing more than cash cows that will increase the millions of pounds that it already has; moneys that have been harvested from dog owners?

(NAME AND EMAIL SUPPLIED)

Go To Top Of Page

 


12-06-08 USA

Dear Terrier World

Great Magazine.
Is this the six degrees of separation?
I have two AKC champion Kerries. Lilah and Inky. In turn, I chose my kennel name Kerrylink using the first two letters and the last two letters from there names. The thing is that a friend of mine was on vacation and came across a pub in Ireland
"The Danny Mann Inn" which just happens to be in county Kerry. I did drop them a line and told them the story, and that I have American mascots for them.
Irony?
Just thought I would share

Danny Mann

USA

 

 

13-06-08

breed: Glen of Imaal
Dear Terrier World,

Just been 'tidying'out my show bag & found your flyer given to me at National Terrier.
The head study you have of a Glen on your Breeds page is appalling & unrecognisable as a Glen. Hound ears are penalised in our standard.

Mrs MA Quinn
Thirsk,
North Yorkshire

[ We at terrierworld.co.uk share your concern. We have informed the 'Glen Of Imaal Ear Police to seek out and apprehend the Artist responsible. When he is arrested he will be held in quarantine until 2009. He will be taken to the NEC on the final day of Crufts to fight Ronnie Irving 'Bare Knuckled' in kilts (Before BIS) as his punishment. ]

Go To Top Of Page



VETERINARY MALPRACTICE 05-06-08

Dear Terrier World

I would just like to agree with your other letter. Mr. Higgott is a wonderful vet and a very nice man. I have been visiting him at his surgery for 2 years on the recomendation of my Aunt, who has been using Mr. Higgott for some years. Another vet in the Wallasey area misdiagnosed my dog, but Mr. Higgott knew exactly what was wrong with him and made him better.
I would not trust any other vet with my animals. Only last week he neutered my Shih Tzu bitch and she was fine the next day. He is an excellent surgeon. Mr. Higgott has always been friendly, polite and professional with me. I have always found his premises to be clean and tidy when I have visited.
I am at the surgery alot! I have 3 dogs, 10 cats, 4 rabbits, a Hamster and a Tortoise! I would not be able to own all my animals if Mr. Higgott was not a vet. He is the people's vet and long may he be so.

Helen Miles

The Complete Article Can Be Found On The Archive News Page for May Dated May 3, 2008

DOG LEFT DYING IN FILTHY CAGE
WALLASEY
MERSEYSIDE
May 3, 2008
Vet’s position at risk after leaving dying dog in filthy....

Go To Top Of Page


VETERINARY MALPRACTICE 26-05-08

I WOULD LIKE MY COMMENTS TO BE PUBLISHED IN RESPONSE TO YOUR ARTICLE

RE:- MR LESLIE HIGGOTT -- VETERINARY MALPRACTICE.

Dear Terrier World

I have been taking my animals to Mr Higgott for 20 years,and I wouldn't trust another vet with any of them!
He's a wonderful man and an outstanding veterinary whom I've always found to be caring, sensative,respectful, kind, humerous and expertly talented!
What he offers besides his professional practise, is a 100%
genuine service, like no other vet I have ever encountered. Having lived periodically in different parts of the country and kept animals all my life, I have experienced many other vets. None of them have possessed a scrap of the integrity and compassion of this unique man. While I empathize with Mrs Cooks loss, I find it completely unjust that one persons negative experience could erradicate a lifetime of dedicated work.
Other peoples experience and opinions must surely count if we truely live in a democratic society!

M.Galloway

(Wallasey, Merseyside)

The Complete Article Can Be Found On The Archive News Page for May Dated May 3, 2008

DOG LEFT DYING IN FILTHY CAGE
WALLASEY
MERSEYSIDE
May 3, 2008
Vet’s position at risk after leaving dying dog in filthy


Go To Top Of Page